A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences, Enablers and Barriers of Rheumatic Heart Disease Care in Uganda.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Global Heart Pub Date : 2023-02-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/gh.1181
Hadija Nalubwama, Jafesi Pulle, Jenifer Atala, Rachel Sarnacki, Miriam Nakitto, Rebecca Namara, Andrea Beaton, Rosemary Kansiime, Rachel Mwima, Emma Ndagire, Emmy Okello, David Watkins
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences, Enablers and Barriers of Rheumatic Heart Disease Care in Uganda.","authors":"Hadija Nalubwama, Jafesi Pulle, Jenifer Atala, Rachel Sarnacki, Miriam Nakitto, Rebecca Namara, Andrea Beaton, Rosemary Kansiime, Rachel Mwima, Emma Ndagire, Emmy Okello, David Watkins","doi":"10.5334/gh.1181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a significant public health problem in countries with limited health resources. People living with RHD face numerous social challenges and have difficulty navigating ill-equipped health systems. This study sought to understand the impact of RHD on PLWRHD and their households and families in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 36 people living with RHD sampled purposively from Uganda's national RHD research registry, stratifying the sample by geography and severity of disease. Our interview guides and data analysis used a combination of inductive and deductive methods, with the latter informed by the socio-ecological model. We ran thematic content analysis to identify codes that were then collapsed into themes. Coding was done independently by three analysts, who compared their results and iteratively updated the codebook.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inductive portion of our analysis, which focused on the patient experience, revealed a significant impact of RHD on work and school. Participants often lived in fear of the future, faced limited childbirth choices, experienced domestic conflict, and suffered stigmatization and low self-esteem. The deductive portion of our analysis focused on barriers and enablers to care. Major barriers included the high out-of-pocket cost of medicines and travel to health facilities, as well as poor access to RHD diagnostics and medications. Major enablers included family and social support, financial support within the community, and good relationships with health workers, though this varied considerably by location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite several personal and community factors that support resilience, PLWRHD in Uganda experience a range of negative physical, emotional, and social consequences from their condition. Greater investment is needed in primary healthcare systems to support decentralized, patient-centered care for RHD. Implementing evidence-based interventions that prevent RHD at district level could greatly reduce the scale of human suffering. There is need to increase investment in primary prevention and tackling social determinants, to reduce the incidence of RHD in communities where the condition remains endemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"18 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a significant public health problem in countries with limited health resources. People living with RHD face numerous social challenges and have difficulty navigating ill-equipped health systems. This study sought to understand the impact of RHD on PLWRHD and their households and families in Uganda.

Methods: In this qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 36 people living with RHD sampled purposively from Uganda's national RHD research registry, stratifying the sample by geography and severity of disease. Our interview guides and data analysis used a combination of inductive and deductive methods, with the latter informed by the socio-ecological model. We ran thematic content analysis to identify codes that were then collapsed into themes. Coding was done independently by three analysts, who compared their results and iteratively updated the codebook.

Results: The inductive portion of our analysis, which focused on the patient experience, revealed a significant impact of RHD on work and school. Participants often lived in fear of the future, faced limited childbirth choices, experienced domestic conflict, and suffered stigmatization and low self-esteem. The deductive portion of our analysis focused on barriers and enablers to care. Major barriers included the high out-of-pocket cost of medicines and travel to health facilities, as well as poor access to RHD diagnostics and medications. Major enablers included family and social support, financial support within the community, and good relationships with health workers, though this varied considerably by location.

Conclusion: Despite several personal and community factors that support resilience, PLWRHD in Uganda experience a range of negative physical, emotional, and social consequences from their condition. Greater investment is needed in primary healthcare systems to support decentralized, patient-centered care for RHD. Implementing evidence-based interventions that prevent RHD at district level could greatly reduce the scale of human suffering. There is need to increase investment in primary prevention and tackling social determinants, to reduce the incidence of RHD in communities where the condition remains endemic.

Abstract Image

乌干达风湿性心脏病患者护理经验、促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
导言:在医疗资源有限的国家,风湿性心脏病(RHD)仍然是一个严重的公共卫生问题。风湿性心脏病患者面临着众多社会挑战,在设备落后的医疗系统中举步维艰。本研究旨在了解风湿性心脏病对乌干达风湿性心脏病患者及其家庭的影响:在这项定性研究中,我们对 36 名从乌干达全国 RHD 研究登记处有目的地抽取的 RHD 患者进行了深入访谈,并根据地域和疾病严重程度对样本进行了分层。我们的访谈指南和数据分析结合使用了归纳法和演绎法,其中演绎法参考了社会生态模型。我们进行了主题内容分析,以确定编码,然后将其归纳为主题。编码工作由三位分析师独立完成,他们对各自的结果进行比较,并反复更新编码手册:我们分析的归纳部分侧重于患者的经历,揭示了 RHD 对工作和学习的重大影响。参与者往往对未来充满恐惧,面临有限的生育选择,经历家庭冲突,并遭受侮辱和自卑。我们分析的演绎部分侧重于护理的障碍和促进因素。主要障碍包括高昂的自付药费和前往医疗机构的路费,以及难以获得急诊科医生的诊断和药物。主要的促进因素包括家庭和社会支持、社区内的经济支持以及与卫生工作者的良好关系,但不同地区的情况差异很大:结论:尽管有一些个人和社区因素支持恢复能力,但乌干达的艾滋病毒/艾滋病 PLWRHD 患者在身体、情感和社会方面仍会受到一系列负面影响。需要加大对初级医疗保健系统的投资,以支持分散式、以患者为中心的生殖健康风险护理。在地区一级实施以证据为基础的干预措施来预防流脑,可以大大减轻人类的痛苦。有必要增加对初级预防和解决社会决定因素的投资,以减少仍然流行此病的社区的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Heart
Global Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources. Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention. Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信