Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.

Abstract

Pressure ulcers are a common problem among individuals who, for medical reasons, must spend most of their day in bed. Manually turning a person's body is labor intensive and can easily cause occupational injuries. To compare the effectiveness of a new assisted turning mattress in pressure management with that of a conventional air mattress. This is a single-session crossover trial study. Twenty-four participants confined to bed were transferred onto the selected mattress (assisted turning or conventional air mattresses) in the selected position. Average interface pressures of bony prominences were measured after the participants laid on the mattress in different positions. After the data collection, they were transferred to the second mattress, and the process was repeated. Subjective feedback from participants and caregivers was also acquired immediately following a one-week trial period of assisted turning mattresses. The mean interface pressures were comparable for most body parts between two mattresses. Subjective feedback showed that assisted turning mattresses could relieve caregivers' workload but at the cost of patients' decreased feelings of safety. Assisted turning mattresses are equal to conventional air mattresses in pressure distribution. Proper pressure management through scheduled positional changes is required in assisted turning mattresses.