Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Hypertension in Pregnancy Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417

Danka Mostic Stanisic, Nevena Kalezic, Nina Rajovic, Tatjana Ilic Mostic, Jelena Cumic, Tamara Stanisavljevic, Aleksandra Beleslin, Jelena Stulic, Ivana Rudic, Nevena Divac, Natasa Milic, Radan Stojanovic

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section.

Methods: Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249).

Results: Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus.

查看原文本刊更多论文

剖宫产术后区域麻醉与全身麻醉对生命功能的影响:单中心经验。

背景:目的是确定区域麻醉(RA)对剖宫产术后生命功能的影响，并与气管内麻醉(GEA)进行比较。方法:前瞻性队列研究纳入连续足月剖宫产孕妇(GEA, n = 284;RA, n = 249)。结果:与RA相比，GEA的血压和心率水平较高，脉搏血氧饱和度较低(p < 0.001)。RA的副作用较小(p < 0.05)。结论:在权衡母胎利弊后，应优先选择RA行剖宫产术。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Hypertension in Pregnancy 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Hypertension in Pregnancy is a refereed journal in the English language which publishes data pertaining to human and animal hypertension during gestation. Contributions concerning physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy are acceptable. Published material includes original articles, clinical trials, solicited and unsolicited reviews, editorials, letters, and other material deemed pertinent by the editors.