Mother-infant emotional availability through the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining continuity, stability, and bidirectional associations

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infancy Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1111/infa.12517
Nila Shakiba, Gal Doron, Avigail Gordon-Hacker, Alisa Egotubov, Nicholas J. Wagner, Noa Gueron-Sela
{"title":"Mother-infant emotional availability through the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining continuity, stability, and bidirectional associations","authors":"Nila Shakiba,&nbsp;Gal Doron,&nbsp;Avigail Gordon-Hacker,&nbsp;Alisa Egotubov,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Wagner,&nbsp;Noa Gueron-Sela","doi":"10.1111/infa.12517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic may impact the development of infants' social communication patterns with their caregivers. The current study examined continuity, stability, and bidirectional associations in maternal and infant dyadic Emotional Availability (EA) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were 110 Israeli mother-infant dyads (51% girls) that were assessed prior to (<i>M</i>age = 3.5 months) and during (<i>M</i>age = 12.4 months) the pandemic. At both time points, mother-infant interactions were observed during play (nonstressful context) and tasks designed to elicit infant frustration (stressful context). Maternal and child EA were coded offline. Maternal EA demonstrated no significant mean-level changes from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas infant responsiveness and involvement increased over time. Stability and bidirectional associations in EA differed by context and were evident only in the stressful context. Mothers' perceived levels of social support further moderated these associations. Specifically, infants' pre-pandemic responsiveness and involvement predicted maternal EA during the pandemic only when mothers reported low levels of social support. Our findings suggest that maternal and child EA were not adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, patterns of EA demonstrated moderate-to-no stability over time, suggesting considerable individual differences in trajectories of EA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/71/INFA-28-34.PMC9877570.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic may impact the development of infants' social communication patterns with their caregivers. The current study examined continuity, stability, and bidirectional associations in maternal and infant dyadic Emotional Availability (EA) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were 110 Israeli mother-infant dyads (51% girls) that were assessed prior to (Mage = 3.5 months) and during (Mage = 12.4 months) the pandemic. At both time points, mother-infant interactions were observed during play (nonstressful context) and tasks designed to elicit infant frustration (stressful context). Maternal and child EA were coded offline. Maternal EA demonstrated no significant mean-level changes from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas infant responsiveness and involvement increased over time. Stability and bidirectional associations in EA differed by context and were evident only in the stressful context. Mothers' perceived levels of social support further moderated these associations. Specifically, infants' pre-pandemic responsiveness and involvement predicted maternal EA during the pandemic only when mothers reported low levels of social support. Our findings suggest that maternal and child EA were not adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, patterns of EA demonstrated moderate-to-no stability over time, suggesting considerable individual differences in trajectories of EA.

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行期间母婴情感可用性:检查连续性、稳定性和双向关联
2019冠状病毒病大流行可能会影响婴儿与照顾者社会沟通模式的发展。目前的研究考察了COVID-19大流行之前和期间母婴二元情绪可用性(EA)的连续性、稳定性和双向关联。参与者是在大流行之前(3.5个月)和期间(12.4个月)评估的110对以色列母婴(51%为女孩)。在这两个时间点,在游戏(无压力环境)和旨在引起婴儿沮丧的任务(压力环境)中观察到母婴互动。母婴EA离线编码。从COVID-19大流行之前到期间,母体EA没有显着的平均水平变化,而婴儿的反应性和参与性随着时间的推移而增加。EA的稳定性和双向关联因环境而异,仅在应激环境中表现明显。母亲感知到的社会支持水平进一步缓和了这些关联。具体而言,只有当母亲报告的社会支持水平较低时,婴儿在大流行前的反应和参与才能预测大流行期间母亲的EA。我们的研究结果表明,孕产妇和儿童EA未受到COVID-19大流行的不利影响。然而,随着时间的推移,EA的模式显示出中度至不稳定,这表明EA的轨迹存在相当大的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信