Arteriovenous Vascular Loops in Latissimus Free Flap Reconstruction of Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine Wounds.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-03-23 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1726620
David J Cinats, Brian J Harley, Jon B Loftus
{"title":"Arteriovenous Vascular Loops in Latissimus Free Flap Reconstruction of Cervical and Cervicothoracic Spine Wounds.","authors":"David J Cinats, Brian J Harley, Jon B Loftus","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1726620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Wound dehiscence is the most common complication after spinal fusion procedures, resulting in an increase in mortality rate and hospital length of stay. Reconstruction of these wounds presents a challenge, as the spine is dependent on these implants for stability and must be maintained throughout the wound dehiscence treatment protocol. We describe a method for extending the thoracodorsal pedicle with an arteriovenous loop to permit an increased excursion of the latissimus dorsi muscle in patients with exposed implants and present the results of this procedure. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A retrospective review of patients treated with a latissimus free flap with saphenous vein pedicle extension for posterior spinal wounds from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information including comorbidities, previous spine operations, wound size and location, and postoperative complications including total flap loss, flap dehiscence, and need for secondary surgery. <b>Results</b>  Six patients were identified who underwent a total of eight extended pedicle free flaps. Mean age was 64.8 years with a mean follow-up of 12.3 months (range, 6-20 months). Four wounds were in the cervicothoracic region with two wounds in the cervical region. Mean number of previous spine surgeries was 3.5 (range, 2-4). Mean wound size was 189 cm <sup>2</sup> with a mean vein graft length of 28 cm. Wound coverage was successful in five of six patients. Major complications occurred in five of six patients. Total flap loss occurred in two patients (33%) and both underwent a second extended latissimus flap from the contralateral side. Three patients developed postoperative flap dehiscence which resolved with regular dressing changes. <b>Conclusion</b>  Extended pedicle latissimus flaps are an effective treatment for posterior spine wounds but are associated with a high complication rate, secondary to medically complex patients with multiple prior surgeries. Careful patient selection is critical for success.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904979/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1726620.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Wound dehiscence is the most common complication after spinal fusion procedures, resulting in an increase in mortality rate and hospital length of stay. Reconstruction of these wounds presents a challenge, as the spine is dependent on these implants for stability and must be maintained throughout the wound dehiscence treatment protocol. We describe a method for extending the thoracodorsal pedicle with an arteriovenous loop to permit an increased excursion of the latissimus dorsi muscle in patients with exposed implants and present the results of this procedure. Materials and Methods  A retrospective review of patients treated with a latissimus free flap with saphenous vein pedicle extension for posterior spinal wounds from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information including comorbidities, previous spine operations, wound size and location, and postoperative complications including total flap loss, flap dehiscence, and need for secondary surgery. Results  Six patients were identified who underwent a total of eight extended pedicle free flaps. Mean age was 64.8 years with a mean follow-up of 12.3 months (range, 6-20 months). Four wounds were in the cervicothoracic region with two wounds in the cervical region. Mean number of previous spine surgeries was 3.5 (range, 2-4). Mean wound size was 189 cm 2 with a mean vein graft length of 28 cm. Wound coverage was successful in five of six patients. Major complications occurred in five of six patients. Total flap loss occurred in two patients (33%) and both underwent a second extended latissimus flap from the contralateral side. Three patients developed postoperative flap dehiscence which resolved with regular dressing changes. Conclusion  Extended pedicle latissimus flaps are an effective treatment for posterior spine wounds but are associated with a high complication rate, secondary to medically complex patients with multiple prior surgeries. Careful patient selection is critical for success.

颈椎和颈胸椎伤口拉蒂西肌游离瓣重建中的动静脉血管环。
导言:伤口开裂是脊柱融合术后最常见的并发症,会导致死亡率和住院时间延长。这些伤口的重建是一项挑战,因为脊柱的稳定性依赖于这些植入物,而且必须在整个伤口开裂治疗过程中保持稳定。我们介绍了一种用动静脉环延长胸背侧椎弓根的方法,这种方法允许植入物外露的患者增加背阔肌的外展,并展示了该手术的结果。材料和方法 对 2010 年至 2020 年期间使用带大隐静脉椎弓根延伸的背阔肌游离皮瓣治疗脊柱后方伤口的患者进行回顾性研究。病历回顾了人口统计学信息,包括合并症、既往脊柱手术、伤口大小和位置,以及术后并发症,包括皮瓣完全脱落、皮瓣开裂和需要二次手术。结果 六名患者共接受了八次扩展椎弓根游离皮瓣手术。平均年龄为64.8岁,平均随访时间为12.3个月(6-20个月)。四处伤口位于颈胸区域,两处伤口位于颈椎区域。既往脊椎手术的平均次数为 3.5 次(2-4 次不等)。平均伤口大小为 189 厘米 2,平均静脉移植长度为 28 厘米。六名患者中有五名成功覆盖了伤口。六名患者中有五名出现了主要并发症。两名患者(33%)的皮瓣完全脱落,两人都从对侧接受了第二次扩展阔肌皮瓣。三名患者术后出现皮瓣开裂,定期更换敷料后即可缓解。结论 扩展椎弓根阔筋膜瓣是治疗脊柱后方伤口的有效方法,但并发症发生率较高,这主要是由于患者病情复杂且曾接受过多次手术。谨慎选择患者是成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信