Assessing individual-level measurement precision of the Short Physical Performance Battery using the test information function.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Franco Franchignoni, Andrea Giordano, Linda Rinaldo, Murat Kara, Levent Özçakar
{"title":"Assessing individual-level measurement precision of the Short Physical Performance Battery using the test information function.","authors":"Franco Franchignoni,&nbsp;Andrea Giordano,&nbsp;Linda Rinaldo,&nbsp;Murat Kara,&nbsp;Levent Özçakar","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a commonly used tool to assess lower extremity function, composed of three assessments (standing balance, gait speed, and chair stand). While its validity for group-level decisions has been positively demonstrated, the measurement precision at the individual level needs more clarification. We aimed to examine the SPPB's psychometric characteristics including its conditional measurement precision with Rasch methods in a sample of elderly patients admitted to cardiac rehabilitation. We analyzed prospectively collected SPPB data from 637 patients aged ≥75 years, admitted to our cardiac rehabilitation department (January 2018-July 2019). After classical Rasch analysis, we calculated the test information function to examine the measurement precision of the SPPB along the score continuum. The mean SPPB score was 6.3 points (SD 3.4) (potential range 0-12). Our results confirmed the SPPB unidimensionality (variance attributable to the main factor: 84.8%), appropriate functioning of rating scale categories, internal construct validity (infit and outfit mean-square statistics: 0.90-1.09), and no item local dependence (residual correlations <0.2). However, the measurement precision at the individual level was quite limited (SE >  0.94 logits): the confidence intervals for true scores were, at best, about one-third of the score range (four points). This limited measurement precision increases the risk of inappropriate clinical decisions about individuals in diagnostic classification or change assessment. Therefore, further research of high methodological quality is warranted on this point. Moreover, a clearer distinction between group-level vs. individual-level indicators of change is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a commonly used tool to assess lower extremity function, composed of three assessments (standing balance, gait speed, and chair stand). While its validity for group-level decisions has been positively demonstrated, the measurement precision at the individual level needs more clarification. We aimed to examine the SPPB's psychometric characteristics including its conditional measurement precision with Rasch methods in a sample of elderly patients admitted to cardiac rehabilitation. We analyzed prospectively collected SPPB data from 637 patients aged ≥75 years, admitted to our cardiac rehabilitation department (January 2018-July 2019). After classical Rasch analysis, we calculated the test information function to examine the measurement precision of the SPPB along the score continuum. The mean SPPB score was 6.3 points (SD 3.4) (potential range 0-12). Our results confirmed the SPPB unidimensionality (variance attributable to the main factor: 84.8%), appropriate functioning of rating scale categories, internal construct validity (infit and outfit mean-square statistics: 0.90-1.09), and no item local dependence (residual correlations <0.2). However, the measurement precision at the individual level was quite limited (SE >  0.94 logits): the confidence intervals for true scores were, at best, about one-third of the score range (four points). This limited measurement precision increases the risk of inappropriate clinical decisions about individuals in diagnostic classification or change assessment. Therefore, further research of high methodological quality is warranted on this point. Moreover, a clearer distinction between group-level vs. individual-level indicators of change is necessary.

使用测试信息功能评估短物理性能电池的个人水平测量精度。
短物理性能测试(SPPB)是一种常用的评估下肢功能的工具,由三个评估组成(站立平衡、步态速度和椅子站立)。虽然它对群体层面决策的有效性已经得到了积极的证明,但在个人层面的测量精度需要更多的澄清。我们的目的是检查SPPB的心理测量特征,包括它的条件测量精度Rasch方法在入院的老年患者心脏康复样本。我们对2018年1月至2019年7月在心脏康复科住院的637例年龄≥75岁的患者的SPPB数据进行前瞻性分析。通过经典的Rasch分析,我们计算了测试信息函数来检验SPPB在分数连续体上的测量精度。SPPB平均评分为6.3分(SD 3.4)(电位范围0-12)。我们的结果证实了SPPB的单维性(主因子方差:84.8%)、评定量表类别的适当功能、内部结构效度(infit和outfit均方统计量:0.90-1.09)和无项目局部依赖性(残差相关0.94 logits):真实得分的置信区间最多约为得分范围的三分之一(4分)。这种有限的测量精度增加了在诊断分类或变化评估中对个体进行不适当临床决策的风险。因此,在这一点上,有必要进行高质量的进一步研究。此外,有必要更清楚地区分群体水平和个人水平的变化指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信