Utility of Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography as an Alternative to Transesophageal Echocardiogram for Preoperative Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Planning.

Q2 Medicine
Craig Basman, Caroline Ong, Tikal Kansara, Zain Kassam, Caleb Wutawunashe, Jennifer Conroy, Arber Kodra, Biana Trost, Priti Mehla, Luigi Pirelli, Jacob Scheinerman, Varinder P Singh, Chad A Kliger
{"title":"Utility of Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography as an Alternative to Transesophageal Echocardiogram for Preoperative Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Planning.","authors":"Craig Basman,&nbsp;Caroline Ong,&nbsp;Tikal Kansara,&nbsp;Zain Kassam,&nbsp;Caleb Wutawunashe,&nbsp;Jennifer Conroy,&nbsp;Arber Kodra,&nbsp;Biana Trost,&nbsp;Priti Mehla,&nbsp;Luigi Pirelli,&nbsp;Jacob Scheinerman,&nbsp;Varinder P Singh,&nbsp;Chad A Kliger","doi":"10.4250/jcvi.2022.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of degenerative mitral regurgitation (dMR) and preoperative planning for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr). TEE is an invasive modality requiring anesthesia and esophageal intubation. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has limited the number of elective invasive procedures. Multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (MDCT) provides high-resolution images and 3D reconstructions to assess complex mitral anatomy. We hypothesized that MDCT would reveal similar information to TEE relevant to TMVr, thus deferring the need for a preoperative TEE in certain situations like during a pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data on patients who underwent or were evaluated for TMVr for dMR with preoperative MDCT and TEE between 2017 and 2019. Two TEE and 2 MDCT readers, blinded to patient outcome, analyzed: leaflet pathology (flail, degenerative, mixed), leaflet location, mitral valve area (MVA), flail width/gap, anterior-posterior (AP) and commissural diameters, posterior leaflet length, leaflet thickness, presence of mitral valve cleft and degree of mitral annular calcification (MAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 (out of 87) patients had preoperative MDCT. MDCT correctly identified the leaflet pathology in 77% (17/22), flail leaflet in 91% (10/11), MAC degree in 91% (10/11) and the dysfunctional leaflet location in 95% (21/22) of patients. There were no differences in the measurements for MVA, flail width, commissural or AP diameter, posterior leaflet length, and leaflet thickness. MDCT overestimated the measurements of flail gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For preoperative TMVr planning, MDCT provided similar measurements to TEE in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"31 1","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/33/jcvi-31-18.PMC9880348.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2022.0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of degenerative mitral regurgitation (dMR) and preoperative planning for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr). TEE is an invasive modality requiring anesthesia and esophageal intubation. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has limited the number of elective invasive procedures. Multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (MDCT) provides high-resolution images and 3D reconstructions to assess complex mitral anatomy. We hypothesized that MDCT would reveal similar information to TEE relevant to TMVr, thus deferring the need for a preoperative TEE in certain situations like during a pandemic.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients who underwent or were evaluated for TMVr for dMR with preoperative MDCT and TEE between 2017 and 2019. Two TEE and 2 MDCT readers, blinded to patient outcome, analyzed: leaflet pathology (flail, degenerative, mixed), leaflet location, mitral valve area (MVA), flail width/gap, anterior-posterior (AP) and commissural diameters, posterior leaflet length, leaflet thickness, presence of mitral valve cleft and degree of mitral annular calcification (MAC).

Results: A total of 22 (out of 87) patients had preoperative MDCT. MDCT correctly identified the leaflet pathology in 77% (17/22), flail leaflet in 91% (10/11), MAC degree in 91% (10/11) and the dysfunctional leaflet location in 95% (21/22) of patients. There were no differences in the measurements for MVA, flail width, commissural or AP diameter, posterior leaflet length, and leaflet thickness. MDCT overestimated the measurements of flail gap.

Conclusions: For preoperative TMVr planning, MDCT provided similar measurements to TEE in our study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多探测器计算机断层血管造影作为经食管超声心动图的替代方案在经导管二尖瓣术前修复计划中的应用。
背景:三维(3D)经食管超声心动图(TEE)是诊断退行性二尖瓣反流(dMR)和术前规划经导管二尖瓣修复(TMVr)的金标准。TEE是一种需要麻醉和食管插管的侵入性手术。严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒大流行限制了选择性侵入性手术的数量。多探测器计算机断层血管造影(MDCT)提供高分辨率图像和三维重建,以评估复杂的二尖瓣解剖。我们假设MDCT将揭示与TMVr相关的TEE类似的信息,从而推迟在某些情况下(如在大流行期间)术前TEE的需要。方法:我们回顾性分析了2017年至2019年期间接受TMVr治疗或接受TMVr评估的dMR患者术前MDCT和TEE的数据。2个TEE和2个MDCT读卡器,对患者结果不知情,分析:小叶病理(连枷、退行性、混合性)、小叶位置、二尖瓣面积(MVA)、连枷宽度/间隙、前后(AP)和联合直径、后小叶长度、小叶厚度、二尖瓣裂的存在和二尖瓣环钙化程度(MAC)。结果:87例患者中有22例术前行MDCT检查。MDCT正确识别小叶病理77%(17/22),连枷小叶91% (10/11),MAC度91%(10/11),功能失调小叶位置95%(21/22)。在MVA、连枷宽度、连接或AP直径、后小叶长度和小叶厚度的测量上没有差异。MDCT高估了连枷间隙的测量值。结论:在我们的研究中,对于术前TMVr计划,MDCT提供了与TEE相似的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信