{"title":"Open Access Publishing Models and How OA Can Work in the Humanities","authors":"Martin Paul Eve","doi":"10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EDITOR'S SUMMARYOpen access (OA) has been shaping and benefitting the scientific community for years now, but this new wave of disseminating research freely has not quite taken hold in the field of humanities. Though humanities publishers could also benefit from an OA model, many have been resistant, citing possible issues with plagiarism or appropriation of an author's work for less than ideal uses. There are also challenges with the cost of publishing OA content, which for humanities could be much higher than in the scientific community due to the length of works produced. Some institutions have taken to charging authors to publish their content in an OA model, while others have opted for a membership structure or joining a consortium of other institutions, such as Knowledge Unlatched or the Open Library of Humanities. While many great strides have been taken to bring OA to humanities, there is still work to do to make the study of humanity accessible to all.","PeriodicalId":100205,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"43 5","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430505","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
EDITOR'S SUMMARYOpen access (OA) has been shaping and benefitting the scientific community for years now, but this new wave of disseminating research freely has not quite taken hold in the field of humanities. Though humanities publishers could also benefit from an OA model, many have been resistant, citing possible issues with plagiarism or appropriation of an author's work for less than ideal uses. There are also challenges with the cost of publishing OA content, which for humanities could be much higher than in the scientific community due to the length of works produced. Some institutions have taken to charging authors to publish their content in an OA model, while others have opted for a membership structure or joining a consortium of other institutions, such as Knowledge Unlatched or the Open Library of Humanities. While many great strides have been taken to bring OA to humanities, there is still work to do to make the study of humanity accessible to all.
多年来,开放获取(OA)一直在塑造和造福科学界,但这一自由传播研究成果的新浪潮尚未在人文学科领域完全扎根。尽管人文学科出版商也可以从开放获取模式中受益,但许多出版商一直持抵制态度,他们认为可能存在剽窃或盗用作者作品的问题。出版开放获取内容的成本也存在挑战,由于作品的长度,人文学科的成本可能比科学领域高得多。一些机构已经开始向以开放获取模式发布内容的作者收费,而另一些机构则选择了会员制结构或加入其他机构的联盟,如Knowledge unlatch或Open Library of Humanities。虽然在将开放获取引入人文学科方面已经取得了许多巨大的进步,但仍有许多工作要做,以使所有人都能获得对人类的研究。