Leveraging the electronic medical record to measure fidelity to the primary care behavioral health model: Implications for clinical and research pursuits.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000778
Aubrey R Dueweke, Matthew Tolliver, Allen Archer, Jodi Polaha
{"title":"Leveraging the electronic medical record to measure fidelity to the primary care behavioral health model: Implications for clinical and research pursuits.","authors":"Aubrey R Dueweke,&nbsp;Matthew Tolliver,&nbsp;Allen Archer,&nbsp;Jodi Polaha","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model of integration has been widely implemented across a number of noteworthy health care systems. However, lack of consistent measurement and reporting of the degree to which the PCBH model has been implemented as developers intended has resulted in two disadvantages in the field. First, clinical quality improvement efforts are hampered by lack of clear guidance on what elements are central to PCBH implementation. Second, the dearth of empirical studies reporting model fidelity impedes cross-study comparisons and limits the rigor of PCBH-focused research. Efforts to expand measurement of PCBH model fidelity would benefit from identification of accessible, unbiased metrics that could complement existing self-report measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this article, we describe how we partnered with our clinical informatics team to incorporate PCBH fidelity metrics into the electronic medical record (EMR), allowing for monthly extraction and review of these data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Next, we describe how we have used monthly fidelity monitoring to inform clinical quality improvement efforts in the context of a developing integrated care program and provide an example of how PCBH fidelity data might be reported in a research article.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Leveraging EMR data to support PCBH fidelity measurement has the potential to strengthen clinical quality improvement efforts and enable more consistent measurement and reporting of PCBH fidelity data in research. Future efforts should aim to parse out the relative contribution of different variables to the success of PCBH integration and evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies at supporting high fidelity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model of integration has been widely implemented across a number of noteworthy health care systems. However, lack of consistent measurement and reporting of the degree to which the PCBH model has been implemented as developers intended has resulted in two disadvantages in the field. First, clinical quality improvement efforts are hampered by lack of clear guidance on what elements are central to PCBH implementation. Second, the dearth of empirical studies reporting model fidelity impedes cross-study comparisons and limits the rigor of PCBH-focused research. Efforts to expand measurement of PCBH model fidelity would benefit from identification of accessible, unbiased metrics that could complement existing self-report measures.

Method: In this article, we describe how we partnered with our clinical informatics team to incorporate PCBH fidelity metrics into the electronic medical record (EMR), allowing for monthly extraction and review of these data.

Results: Next, we describe how we have used monthly fidelity monitoring to inform clinical quality improvement efforts in the context of a developing integrated care program and provide an example of how PCBH fidelity data might be reported in a research article.

Discussion: Leveraging EMR data to support PCBH fidelity measurement has the potential to strengthen clinical quality improvement efforts and enable more consistent measurement and reporting of PCBH fidelity data in research. Future efforts should aim to parse out the relative contribution of different variables to the success of PCBH integration and evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies at supporting high fidelity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

利用电子病历来衡量对初级保健行为健康模型的忠诚度:对临床和研究的启示。
引言:初级保健行为健康(PCBH)整合模式已在许多值得注意的医疗保健系统中广泛实施。然而,由于缺乏对PCBH模型按照开发人员的意图实施的程度的一致测量和报告,导致了该领域的两个缺点。首先,由于缺乏关于PCBH实施的核心要素的明确指导,临床质量改进工作受到阻碍。其次,缺乏报告模型保真度的实证研究阻碍了交叉研究的比较,并限制了以PCBH为重点的研究的严谨性。扩大PCBH模型保真度测量的努力将受益于确定可获得的、无偏见的指标,这些指标可以补充现有的自我报告措施。方法:在这篇文章中,我们描述了我们如何与临床信息学团队合作,将PCBH保真度指标纳入电子病历(EMR),以便每月提取和审查这些数据。结果:接下来,我们描述了我们如何在开发综合护理计划的背景下使用每月保真度监测来为临床质量改进工作提供信息,并提供了一个如何在研究文章中报告PCBH保真度数据的例子。讨论:利用电子病历数据支持PCBH保真度测量有可能加强临床质量改进工作,并在研究中实现PCBH保真数据的更一致的测量和报告。未来的努力应旨在分析不同变量对PCBH集成成功的相对贡献,并评估支持高保真度的实施策略的有效性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信