Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in patients with liver transplant.

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tsujung Yang, Achint Patel, Rishita Pujari, Vincent P Okine, Lakshmi G Chirumamilla, Geethu Jnaneswaran, Athul Raj, Keji L Kwajok, Ruchir Goswami, Prakashkumar Maiyani, Maheshkumar Desai, Hardikkumar Shah, Matthew Grossman
{"title":"Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in patients with liver transplant.","authors":"Tsujung Yang,&nbsp;Achint Patel,&nbsp;Rishita Pujari,&nbsp;Vincent P Okine,&nbsp;Lakshmi G Chirumamilla,&nbsp;Geethu Jnaneswaran,&nbsp;Athul Raj,&nbsp;Keji L Kwajok,&nbsp;Ruchir Goswami,&nbsp;Prakashkumar Maiyani,&nbsp;Maheshkumar Desai,&nbsp;Hardikkumar Shah,&nbsp;Matthew Grossman","doi":"10.5114/ceh.2022.119246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Biliary complications are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplant (LT). However, national data on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) usage and outcomes in LT patients are lacking. Our study aims to identify the trends, outcomes, and predictors of ERCP and related complications in this patient subgroup.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We derived our study cohort from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) between 2007 and 2017. LT patients were identified using ICD-9/10CM diagnosis codes and patients who underwent ERCP were identified by ICD-9/10-CM procedure codes. We utilized the Cochrane-Armitage trend test and multivariate logistic regression to analyze temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 372,814 hospitalizations occurred in LT patients between 2007 and 2017. ERCP was performed in 2.05% (<i>n</i> = 7632) of all hospitalizations. There was a rise in ERCP procedures from 1.96% (<i>n</i> = 477) in 2007 to 2.05% (<i>n</i> = 845) in 2017. Among LT patients who underwent ERCP, the in-hospital mortality rate was 1% (<i>n</i> = 73) and 8% (<i>n</i> = 607) were discharged to facilities. Mean length of hospital stay was 7 ±0.3 days. Septicemia was the most common periprocedural complication (18.3%, <i>n</i> = 1399) followed by post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.8%, <i>n</i> = 674).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been an increase in ERCP procedures over the past decade among LT patients. Our study highlights the periprocedural complications and outcomes of ERCP in LT patients from a nationally representative dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":10281,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"8 3","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/fa/CEH-8-47756.PMC9850314.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2022.119246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim of the study: Biliary complications are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplant (LT). However, national data on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) usage and outcomes in LT patients are lacking. Our study aims to identify the trends, outcomes, and predictors of ERCP and related complications in this patient subgroup.

Material and methods: We derived our study cohort from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) between 2007 and 2017. LT patients were identified using ICD-9/10CM diagnosis codes and patients who underwent ERCP were identified by ICD-9/10-CM procedure codes. We utilized the Cochrane-Armitage trend test and multivariate logistic regression to analyze temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors.

Results: A total of 372,814 hospitalizations occurred in LT patients between 2007 and 2017. ERCP was performed in 2.05% (n = 7632) of all hospitalizations. There was a rise in ERCP procedures from 1.96% (n = 477) in 2007 to 2.05% (n = 845) in 2017. Among LT patients who underwent ERCP, the in-hospital mortality rate was 1% (n = 73) and 8% (n = 607) were discharged to facilities. Mean length of hospital stay was 7 ±0.3 days. Septicemia was the most common periprocedural complication (18.3%, n = 1399) followed by post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.8%, n = 674).

Conclusions: There has been an increase in ERCP procedures over the past decade among LT patients. Our study highlights the periprocedural complications and outcomes of ERCP in LT patients from a nationally representative dataset.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肝移植患者的内镜逆行胆管胰管造影结果。
研究目的:胆道并发症是肝移植术后发病率和死亡率的主要原因。然而,关于内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)在LT患者中的使用和结果的国家数据缺乏。我们的研究旨在确定该患者亚组ERCP和相关并发症的趋势、结果和预测因素。材料和方法:我们的研究队列来自2007年至2017年医疗成本和利用项目(HCUP)的全国住院患者样本(NIS)。使用ICD-9/10CM诊断代码识别LT患者,使用ICD-9/10-CM程序代码识别ERCP患者。我们使用Cochrane-Armitage趋势检验和多元逻辑回归分析时间趋势、结果和预测因子。结果:2007年至2017年期间,LT患者共住院372,814例。2.05% (n = 7632)的住院患者接受ERCP治疗。ERCP手术的比例从2007年的1.96% (n = 477)上升到2017年的2.05% (n = 845)。在接受ERCP的LT患者中,住院死亡率为1% (n = 73),出院率为8% (n = 607)。平均住院时间为7±0.3 d。败血症是最常见的围手术期并发症(18.3%,n = 1399),其次是ercp后胰腺炎(8.8%,n = 674)。结论:在过去的十年中,肝移植患者的ERCP手术有所增加。我们的研究从全国代表性数据集中强调了肝移植患者ERCP的围手术期并发症和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hepatology – quarterly of the Polish Association for Study of Liver – is a scientific and educational, peer-reviewed journal publishing original and review papers describing clinical and basic investigations in the field of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信