Comparative Study of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Intraoperative Levobupivacaine Local Infiltration Anesthesia and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Following Gynecologic Laparoscopy.

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Akiko Otake, Naoko Sasamoto, Noriko Sato, Ryota Kumasaka, Yoshimitsu Yamamoto, Kazushige Adachi
{"title":"Comparative Study of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Intraoperative Levobupivacaine Local Infiltration Anesthesia and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Following Gynecologic Laparoscopy.","authors":"Akiko Otake,&nbsp;Naoko Sasamoto,&nbsp;Noriko Sato,&nbsp;Ryota Kumasaka,&nbsp;Yoshimitsu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Kazushige Adachi","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_120_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to assess the postoperative analgesic effect of intraoperative levobupivacaine local infiltration anesthesia (LA) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in gynecologic laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis on the data of 260 patients treated by gynecologic laparoscopy (adnexal surgery, hysterectomy, and myomectomy) between January 2019 and December 2020 at Minoh City Hospital, Osaka Japan. Patients were divided into two groups: intraoperative LA group and TAP block group. We assessed clinical characteristics, surgical results, postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores, and the frequency of analgesic use up to 24 h after surgery in overall and by each type of surgery. Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS pain score was statistically significantly higher in the LA group than in the TAP group 1 h after surgery in overall (<i>P</i> = 0.04), with NRS difference of 0.4 which was not clinically significant. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery or in the frequency of analgesic use up to 24 h after surgery in overall and by type of surgery. Endometriosis was associated with increased postoperative pain at 1 h after surgery in adnexal surgeries (<i>P</i> = 0.04) and suggestive for all surgeries. Younger age was related to more frequency of analgesic use up to 24 h after surgery in overall, adnexal surgeries, and hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative levobupivacaine LA may have similar postoperative analgesic effects as TAP block in gynecologic laparoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"11 4","pages":"231-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/b4/GMIT-11-231.PMC9844037.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_120_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: We aim to assess the postoperative analgesic effect of intraoperative levobupivacaine local infiltration anesthesia (LA) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in gynecologic laparoscopy.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on the data of 260 patients treated by gynecologic laparoscopy (adnexal surgery, hysterectomy, and myomectomy) between January 2019 and December 2020 at Minoh City Hospital, Osaka Japan. Patients were divided into two groups: intraoperative LA group and TAP block group. We assessed clinical characteristics, surgical results, postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores, and the frequency of analgesic use up to 24 h after surgery in overall and by each type of surgery. Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis.

Results: NRS pain score was statistically significantly higher in the LA group than in the TAP group 1 h after surgery in overall (P = 0.04), with NRS difference of 0.4 which was not clinically significant. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery or in the frequency of analgesic use up to 24 h after surgery in overall and by type of surgery. Endometriosis was associated with increased postoperative pain at 1 h after surgery in adnexal surgeries (P = 0.04) and suggestive for all surgeries. Younger age was related to more frequency of analgesic use up to 24 h after surgery in overall, adnexal surgeries, and hysterectomy.

Conclusion: Intraoperative levobupivacaine LA may have similar postoperative analgesic effects as TAP block in gynecologic laparoscopy.

妇科腹腔镜术中左布比卡因局部浸润麻醉与经腹平面阻滞术后镇痛效果的比较研究。
目的:评价术中左布比卡因局部浸润麻醉(LA)和经腹面阻滞(TAP)在妇科腹腔镜手术中的术后镇痛效果。材料和方法:我们对2019年1月至2020年12月在日本大阪Minoh市医院接受妇科腹腔镜(附件手术、子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术)治疗的260例患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。患者分为术中LA组和TAP阻断组。我们评估了临床特征、手术结果、术后数值评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分以及术后24小时内镇痛药的使用频率。统计学分析采用Pearson χ2检验、Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis检验。多因素分析采用多元回归分析。结果:术后1 h LA组NRS疼痛评分总体高于TAP组(P = 0.04), NRS差异为0.4,差异无临床意义。术后3、6、12和24小时的NRS疼痛评分,以及术后24小时镇痛药使用频率的总体和手术类型均无显著差异。子宫内膜异位症与附件手术术后1小时疼痛增加相关(P = 0.04),对所有手术均有提示作用。在总体手术、附件手术和子宫切除术后24小时内,年龄越小,使用镇痛药的频率越高。结论:左旋布比卡因LA在妇科腹腔镜手术中可能具有与TAP阻滞相似的术后镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信