Comparison of Therapeutic Effects Between Electroacupuncture and Thread-Embedded Acupuncture in Obese Patients Undergoing a Dietary Intervention.

IF 0.8 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1089/acu.2022.0009
Cindy Notonegoro, Christina Simadibrata, Triyani Kresnawan
{"title":"Comparison of Therapeutic Effects Between Electroacupuncture and Thread-Embedded Acupuncture in Obese Patients Undergoing a Dietary Intervention.","authors":"Cindy Notonegoro, Christina Simadibrata, Triyani Kresnawan","doi":"10.1089/acu.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Obesity is an epidemic with an increasing prevalence in developing countries. The condition affects almost all physiologic functions of the body and is a significant threat to public health. Treatment of obesity is often difficult and expensive. Pharmacologic therapy has many side-effects. Acupuncture, a nonpharmacologic therapy, has shown promising results for treating obesity. Electroacupuncture (EA) and thread-embedded acupuncture (TEA) can be used. The aim of this study was to analyze the therapeutic effects of EA and TEA, using polydioxanone (PDO), on weight loss, waist circumference, and plasma-leptin concentrations in obese patients undergoing a dietary intervention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial randomized 34 subjects into 2 groups: EA and TEA. In the EA group, EA was administered 3 times per week for 4 weeks (a total of 12 sessions). In the TEA group, EA was administered only once. Body weight and waist circumference were measured at baseline, and on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 (end) of the trial. Plasma-leptin concentrations were measured at the beginning and end of the trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in body weight and waist circumference in the groups before and after treatment (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and a significant decrease in plasma-leptin concentrations in the EA (<i>P</i> = 0.012) and TEA groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in weight loss (<i>P</i> = 0.621), waist circumference (<i>P</i> = 0.545), and plasma-leptin concentration (<i>P</i> = 0.784).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EA and PDO TEA are equally effective for reducing body weight, waist circumference, and plasma-leptin concentrations in obese patients undergoing dietary interventions. However, TEA is more time-efficient than EA.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"34 6","pages":"380-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805856/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Obesity is an epidemic with an increasing prevalence in developing countries. The condition affects almost all physiologic functions of the body and is a significant threat to public health. Treatment of obesity is often difficult and expensive. Pharmacologic therapy has many side-effects. Acupuncture, a nonpharmacologic therapy, has shown promising results for treating obesity. Electroacupuncture (EA) and thread-embedded acupuncture (TEA) can be used. The aim of this study was to analyze the therapeutic effects of EA and TEA, using polydioxanone (PDO), on weight loss, waist circumference, and plasma-leptin concentrations in obese patients undergoing a dietary intervention.

Materials and methods: This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial randomized 34 subjects into 2 groups: EA and TEA. In the EA group, EA was administered 3 times per week for 4 weeks (a total of 12 sessions). In the TEA group, EA was administered only once. Body weight and waist circumference were measured at baseline, and on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 (end) of the trial. Plasma-leptin concentrations were measured at the beginning and end of the trial.

Results: There was a significant decrease in body weight and waist circumference in the groups before and after treatment (P < 0.001), and a significant decrease in plasma-leptin concentrations in the EA (P = 0.012) and TEA groups (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in weight loss (P = 0.621), waist circumference (P = 0.545), and plasma-leptin concentration (P = 0.784).

Conclusions: EA and PDO TEA are equally effective for reducing body weight, waist circumference, and plasma-leptin concentrations in obese patients undergoing dietary interventions. However, TEA is more time-efficient than EA.

电针与针刺治疗肥胖饮食干预的疗效比较。
目的:肥胖在发展中国家是一种日益流行的流行病。这种情况几乎影响到身体的所有生理功能,是对公众健康的重大威胁。治疗肥胖通常既困难又昂贵。药物治疗有许多副作用。针灸,一种非药物疗法,在治疗肥胖方面显示出令人鼓舞的效果。可以使用电针(EA)和针刺(TEA)。本研究的目的是分析EA和TEA,使用聚二氧杂环酮(PDO),对接受饮食干预的肥胖患者的体重减轻、腰围和血浆瘦素浓度的治疗效果。材料与方法:本临床试验采用单盲、随机法将34例受试者随机分为EA组和TEA组。EA组每周3次,连续4周(共12次)。在TEA组中,EA仅给予一次。在基线、试验第3天、第7天、第14天、第21天和第28天(结束)测量体重和腰围。在试验开始和结束时测量血浆瘦素浓度。结果:治疗前后两组患者体重、腰围均显著降低(P = 0.012), TEA组患者体重、腰围均显著降低(P = 0.001)。两组间体重减轻(P = 0.621)、腰围(P = 0.545)、血浆瘦素浓度(P = 0.784)差异无统计学意义。结论:EA和PDO TEA对接受饮食干预的肥胖患者降低体重、腰围和血浆瘦素浓度同样有效。然而,TEA比EA更省时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信