Can the Clobber game become a classroom-based tool for screening students' executive functions?

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience
Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2023.07.001
Telma Pará, Luís Alfredo Vidal de Carvalho, Paulo Mattos, Simone Dantas, Sylvain Gravier, Sue Johnston-Wilder
{"title":"Can the Clobber game become a classroom-based tool for screening students' executive functions?","authors":"Telma Pará,&nbsp;Luís Alfredo Vidal de Carvalho,&nbsp;Paulo Mattos,&nbsp;Simone Dantas,&nbsp;Sylvain Gravier,&nbsp;Sue Johnston-Wilder","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of games for cognitive screening is not new and involves employing simple tasks as well as virtual reality. In this work, we introduce the use of the combinatorial game Clobber, created by the mathematicians Albert, Grossman, Nowakowski and Wolfe in 2001 in a classroom-based experiment and analyzed how it can assess cognitive functions. Specifically, this study tries to address how the use of the Clobber game can target executive functions (EFs) and why it may be a valuable game to assess EFs. Executive functions have an extremely complex nature and combine abilities which involve planning, decision-making, productive action, and self-regulation, among others. We performed a cross-sectional study with a sample of 111 participants aged 9-30 from three educational levels in which Clobber was applied in four different configurations varying in complexity. The findings identify two variables that can guide future experiments with Clobber: the game configuration and the time spent solving the game.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"279 ","pages":"81-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2023.07.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of games for cognitive screening is not new and involves employing simple tasks as well as virtual reality. In this work, we introduce the use of the combinatorial game Clobber, created by the mathematicians Albert, Grossman, Nowakowski and Wolfe in 2001 in a classroom-based experiment and analyzed how it can assess cognitive functions. Specifically, this study tries to address how the use of the Clobber game can target executive functions (EFs) and why it may be a valuable game to assess EFs. Executive functions have an extremely complex nature and combine abilities which involve planning, decision-making, productive action, and self-regulation, among others. We performed a cross-sectional study with a sample of 111 participants aged 9-30 from three educational levels in which Clobber was applied in four different configurations varying in complexity. The findings identify two variables that can guide future experiments with Clobber: the game configuration and the time spent solving the game.

小丑游戏能成为一种基于课堂的工具来筛选学生的执行功能吗?
使用游戏进行认知筛查并不是什么新鲜事,它涉及到使用简单的任务和虚拟现实。在这项工作中,我们介绍了数学家Albert、Grossman、Nowakowski和Wolfe于2001年创建的组合游戏Clobber在课堂实验中的使用,并分析了它如何评估认知功能。具体而言,本研究试图解决如何使用Clobber游戏来针对执行功能(EF),以及为什么它可能是评估EF的一个有价值的游戏。行政职能具有极其复杂的性质,综合了规划、决策、生产行动和自我调节等方面的能力。我们对来自三个教育水平的111名9-30岁的参与者进行了一项横断面研究,其中Clobber应用于四种不同的配置,其复杂性各不相同。研究结果确定了两个可以指导未来Clobber实验的变量:游戏配置和解决游戏所花费的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信