Quality and content analysis of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yusuf Sahin, Filip Paslanmaz, Ismail Ulus, Mehmet Yilmaz, Muhammet Murat Dincer, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
{"title":"Quality and content analysis of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube","authors":"Yusuf Sahin,&nbsp;Filip Paslanmaz,&nbsp;Ismail Ulus,&nbsp;Mehmet Yilmaz,&nbsp;Muhammet Murat Dincer,&nbsp;Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu","doi":"10.1111/luts.12468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we aimed to analyze scientific quality and content of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched YouTube using the “female urethroplasty”, “female urethral stricture”, and “urethroplasty” keywords on February 22, 2022. The quality and content of videos were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Female Urethroplasty-Specific Checklist Score (FUSCS) which was developed by our clinic. Video analysis was performed by two independent urologists. The relationship between the video characteristics and GQS and FUSCS was examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 38 videos were analyzed. Fourteen (36.8%) videos were uploaded by academic sources such as urology societies and universities/hospitals, while 24 (63.2%) videos were uploaded by urologists. The median GQS was 3 (range, 2–4) and the median FUSCS was 8 (range, 5–9) for all videos. The Cohen's kappa was 0.834 for GQS and 0.899 for FUSCS, indicating a high level of agreement between the observers. The median GQS was 4 (range, 4–5) and the median FUSCS was 9 (range, 8–10) for academic videos, indicating a statistically significantly higher scores than the urologists videos (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> &lt; .001, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Academic videos on female urethroplasty on YouTube have adequate scientific quality and content for both patients and healthcare professionals. The number of videos by academic sources on female urethroplasty should be increased and individuals should be encouraged to search such videos on search engines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18028,"journal":{"name":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.12468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to analyze scientific quality and content of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube.

Methods

We searched YouTube using the “female urethroplasty”, “female urethral stricture”, and “urethroplasty” keywords on February 22, 2022. The quality and content of videos were analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Female Urethroplasty-Specific Checklist Score (FUSCS) which was developed by our clinic. Video analysis was performed by two independent urologists. The relationship between the video characteristics and GQS and FUSCS was examined.

Results

A total of 38 videos were analyzed. Fourteen (36.8%) videos were uploaded by academic sources such as urology societies and universities/hospitals, while 24 (63.2%) videos were uploaded by urologists. The median GQS was 3 (range, 2–4) and the median FUSCS was 8 (range, 5–9) for all videos. The Cohen's kappa was 0.834 for GQS and 0.899 for FUSCS, indicating a high level of agreement between the observers. The median GQS was 4 (range, 4–5) and the median FUSCS was 9 (range, 8–10) for academic videos, indicating a statistically significantly higher scores than the urologists videos (p = .002 and p < .001, respectively).

Conclusion

Academic videos on female urethroplasty on YouTube have adequate scientific quality and content for both patients and healthcare professionals. The number of videos by academic sources on female urethroplasty should be increased and individuals should be encouraged to search such videos on search engines.

YouTube上女性尿道成形术视频的质量和内容分析
目的在本研究中,我们旨在分析YouTube上女性尿道成形术视频的科学质量和内容。方法于2022年2月22日在YouTube上搜索“女性尿道成形术”、“女性尿道狭窄”、“尿道成形术”等关键词。视频的质量和内容采用我们诊所制定的全球质量评分(GQS)和女性尿道整形特异性检查表评分(FUSCS)进行分析。视频分析由两名独立的泌尿科医生进行。研究了视频特性与GQS和FUSCS的关系。结果共对38段视频进行分析。来自泌尿外科学会和大学/医院等学术来源的视频有14个(36.8%),来自泌尿科医生的视频有24个(63.2%)。所有视频的GQS中位数为3(范围2-4),FUSCS中位数为8(范围5-9)。GQS的科恩kappa为0.834,FUSCS的科恩kappa为0.899,表明观察者之间的一致性很高。学术视频的GQS中位数为4(范围4 - 5),FUSCS中位数为9(范围8-10),均显著高于泌尿科视频(p = 0.002和p <001年,分别)。结论YouTube上关于女性尿道成形术的学术视频对患者和医护人员都有足够的科学质量和内容。应该增加有关女性尿道成形术的学术视频的数量,并鼓励个人在搜索引擎上搜索这些视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: LUTS is designed for the timely communication of peer-reviewed studies which provides new clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers in the field of neurourology, urodynamics and urogynecology. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished referees from around the world, some of whom constitute the journal''s Editorial Board. The journal covers both basic and clinical research on lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD), such as overactive bladder (OAB), detrusor underactivity, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), painful bladder syndrome (PBS), as well as on other relevant conditions. Case reports are published only if new findings are provided. LUTS is an official journal of the Japanese Continence Society, the Korean Continence Society, and the Taiwanese Continence Society. Submission of papers from all countries are welcome. LUTS has been accepted into Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) with a 2011 Impact Factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信