Work from home and musculoskeletal pain in telecommunications workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Azra Huršidić Radulović, Roko Žaja, Milan Milošević, Bojana Radulović, Ivica Luketić, Tajana Božić
{"title":"Work from home and musculoskeletal pain in telecommunications workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot study.","authors":"Azra Huršidić Radulović,&nbsp;Roko Žaja,&nbsp;Milan Milošević,&nbsp;Bojana Radulović,&nbsp;Ivica Luketić,&nbsp;Tajana Božić","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2021-72-3559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the side-effects of the COVID-19 pandemic is a global change in work ergonomic patterns as millions of people replaced their usual work environment with home to limit the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection. The aim of our cross-sectional pilot study was to identify musculoskeletal pain that may have resulted from this change and included 232 telecommunications company workers of both genders [121 (52.2 %) men aged 23-62 (median 41; interquartile range 33-46 yrs.) and 111 (47.8 %) women aged 23-53 (median 40; interquartile range 33-44)] who had been working from home for eight months (from 16 March to 4 December 2020) before they joined the study. The participants were asked to fill in our web-based questionnaire by self-assessing their experience of hand, lower back, and upper back/neck pain while working at home and by describing their work setting and physical activity. Compared to previous work at the office, 90 (39.1 %) participants reported stronger pain in the lower back, 105 (45.7 %) in the upper back/neck, and 63 (27.2 %) in their hands. Only one third did not report any musculoskeletal problems related to work from home. Significantly fewer men than women reported hand, lower back, and upper back/ neck pain (p=0.033, p=0.001 and p=0.013, respectively). Sixty-nine workers (29.9 %) reported to work in a separate room, 75 (32.4 %) worked in a separate section of a room with other household members, whereas 87 (37.7 %) had no separate work space, 30 of whom most often worked in the dining room. Ninety-five participants (40.9 %) had no office desk to work at, and only 75 (32.3 %) used an ergonomic chair. Of those who shared their household with others (N=164), 116 (70.7 %) complained about constant or occasional disturbances. Over a half of all participants (52 %) said that they worked longer hours from home than at work, predominantly women (p=0.05). Only 69 participants (29.9 %) were taking frequent breaks, predominantly older ones (p=0.006). Our findings clearly point to a need to inform home workers how to make more ergonomic use of non-ergonomic equipment, use breaks, and exercise and to inform employers how to better organise working hours to meet the needs of work from home.</p>","PeriodicalId":55462,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"72 3","pages":"232-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/ff/aiht-72-232.PMC8576755.pdf","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2021-72-3559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

One of the side-effects of the COVID-19 pandemic is a global change in work ergonomic patterns as millions of people replaced their usual work environment with home to limit the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection. The aim of our cross-sectional pilot study was to identify musculoskeletal pain that may have resulted from this change and included 232 telecommunications company workers of both genders [121 (52.2 %) men aged 23-62 (median 41; interquartile range 33-46 yrs.) and 111 (47.8 %) women aged 23-53 (median 40; interquartile range 33-44)] who had been working from home for eight months (from 16 March to 4 December 2020) before they joined the study. The participants were asked to fill in our web-based questionnaire by self-assessing their experience of hand, lower back, and upper back/neck pain while working at home and by describing their work setting and physical activity. Compared to previous work at the office, 90 (39.1 %) participants reported stronger pain in the lower back, 105 (45.7 %) in the upper back/neck, and 63 (27.2 %) in their hands. Only one third did not report any musculoskeletal problems related to work from home. Significantly fewer men than women reported hand, lower back, and upper back/ neck pain (p=0.033, p=0.001 and p=0.013, respectively). Sixty-nine workers (29.9 %) reported to work in a separate room, 75 (32.4 %) worked in a separate section of a room with other household members, whereas 87 (37.7 %) had no separate work space, 30 of whom most often worked in the dining room. Ninety-five participants (40.9 %) had no office desk to work at, and only 75 (32.3 %) used an ergonomic chair. Of those who shared their household with others (N=164), 116 (70.7 %) complained about constant or occasional disturbances. Over a half of all participants (52 %) said that they worked longer hours from home than at work, predominantly women (p=0.05). Only 69 participants (29.9 %) were taking frequent breaks, predominantly older ones (p=0.006). Our findings clearly point to a need to inform home workers how to make more ergonomic use of non-ergonomic equipment, use breaks, and exercise and to inform employers how to better organise working hours to meet the needs of work from home.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行期间电信工作者的在家工作和肌肉骨骼疼痛:一项试点研究
COVID-19大流行的副作用之一是全球工作人体工程学模式发生了变化,数百万人将通常的工作环境改为家庭环境,以限制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-COV-2)感染的传播。我们横断试验研究的目的是确定可能由这种变化引起的肌肉骨骼疼痛,研究对象包括232名男女电信公司员工[121名(52.2%)男性,年龄23-62岁(中位数41;四分位数范围33-46岁)和111名(47.8%)女性年龄在23-53岁(中位数40;四分位数区间33-44)],他们在参加研究之前已经在家工作了8个月(从2020年3月16日到12月4日)。参与者被要求填写我们的网络调查问卷,自我评估他们在家工作时手部、下背部和上背部/颈部疼痛的经历,并描述他们的工作环境和身体活动。与之前在办公室的工作相比,90名(39.1%)参与者报告腰背部疼痛加重,105名(45.7%)参与者报告上背部/颈部疼痛加重,63名(27.2%)参与者报告手部疼痛加重。只有三分之一的人没有报告任何与在家工作有关的肌肉骨骼问题。报告手部、下背部和上背部/颈部疼痛的男性明显少于女性(p=0.033, p=0.001和p=0.013)。69名员工(29.9%)在单独的房间工作,75名员工(32.4%)与其他家庭成员在房间的单独区域工作,而87名员工(37.7%)没有单独的工作空间,其中30名员工最常在餐厅工作。95名参与者(40.9%)没有办公桌,只有75名参与者(32.3%)使用符合人体工程学的椅子。在与他人合住的人中(N=164), 116人(70.7%)抱怨经常或偶尔受到干扰。超过一半的参与者(52%)表示,他们在家工作的时间比工作时间长,主要是女性(p=0.05)。只有69名参与者(29.9%)经常休息,主要是老年人(p=0.006)。我们的研究结果清楚地指出,有必要告诉在家工作的人如何更符合人体工程学地使用非人体工程学的设备,利用休息时间和锻炼,并告诉雇主如何更好地安排工作时间,以满足在家工作的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (abbr. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol) is a peer-reviewed biomedical scientific quarterly that publishes contributions relevant to all aspects of environmental and occupational health and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信