Overcoming barriers: Modelling the effect of potential future changes of organized breast cancer screening in Italy.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nadine Zielonke, Carlo Senore, Antonio Ponti, Marcell Csanadi, Harry J de Koning, Eveline A M Heijnsdijk, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn
{"title":"Overcoming barriers: Modelling the effect of potential future changes of organized breast cancer screening in Italy.","authors":"Nadine Zielonke,&nbsp;Carlo Senore,&nbsp;Antonio Ponti,&nbsp;Marcell Csanadi,&nbsp;Harry J de Koning,&nbsp;Eveline A M Heijnsdijk,&nbsp;Nicolien T van Ravesteyn","doi":"10.1177/09691413231153568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Organized breast cancer screening may not achieve its full potential due to organizational and cultural barriers. In Italy, two identified barriers were low attendance in Southern Italy and, in Italy as a whole, underscreening and overscreening in parts of the eligible population. The objective of this study was to identify potential changes to overcome these barriers and to quantify their costs and effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the impact of potential measures to improve breast cancer screening in Italy, we performed an evaluation of costs and effects for increasing adherence for Southern Italy and harmonizing screening intervals (biennial screening) for the whole of Italy, using an online tool (EU-TOPIA evaluation tool) based on the MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis (MISCAN) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing adherence in Southern Italy through investing in mobile screening units has an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio of €9531 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Harmonizing the screening interval by investing in measures to reduce opportunistic screening and simultaneously investing in mobile screening units to reduce underscreening is predicted to gain 1% fewer life-years, while saving 19% of total screening costs compared to the current situation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing adherence in Southern Italy and harmonizing the screening interval could result in substantial improvements at acceptable costs, or in the same benefits at lower costs. This example illustrates a systematic approach that can be easily applied to other European countries, as the online tools can be used by stakeholders to quantify effects and costs of a broad range of specific barriers, and ways to overcome them.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":"30 3","pages":"134-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10399099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231153568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Organized breast cancer screening may not achieve its full potential due to organizational and cultural barriers. In Italy, two identified barriers were low attendance in Southern Italy and, in Italy as a whole, underscreening and overscreening in parts of the eligible population. The objective of this study was to identify potential changes to overcome these barriers and to quantify their costs and effects.

Methods: To assess the impact of potential measures to improve breast cancer screening in Italy, we performed an evaluation of costs and effects for increasing adherence for Southern Italy and harmonizing screening intervals (biennial screening) for the whole of Italy, using an online tool (EU-TOPIA evaluation tool) based on the MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis (MISCAN) model.

Results: Increasing adherence in Southern Italy through investing in mobile screening units has an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio of €9531 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Harmonizing the screening interval by investing in measures to reduce opportunistic screening and simultaneously investing in mobile screening units to reduce underscreening is predicted to gain 1% fewer life-years, while saving 19% of total screening costs compared to the current situation.

Conclusions: Increasing adherence in Southern Italy and harmonizing the screening interval could result in substantial improvements at acceptable costs, or in the same benefits at lower costs. This example illustrates a systematic approach that can be easily applied to other European countries, as the online tools can be used by stakeholders to quantify effects and costs of a broad range of specific barriers, and ways to overcome them.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

克服障碍:模拟意大利有组织乳腺癌筛查的潜在未来变化的影响。
目的:由于组织和文化障碍,有组织的乳腺癌筛查可能无法充分发挥其潜力。在意大利,确定的两个障碍是意大利南部的低出勤率,以及在整个意大利,部分合格人口的筛查不足和过度筛查。本研究的目的是确定克服这些障碍的潜在变化,并量化其成本和影响。方法:为了评估改善意大利乳腺癌筛查的潜在措施的影响,我们使用基于微模拟筛查分析(MISCAN)模型的在线工具(EU-TOPIA评估工具)对增加意大利南部的依从性和协调整个意大利的筛查间隔(两年一次的筛查)的成本和效果进行了评估。结果:在意大利南部,通过投资移动筛查装置来增加依从性,每个质量调整生命年获得9531欧元的可接受成本效益比。通过投资于减少机会性筛查的措施,同时投资于流动筛查装置以减少筛查不足,协调筛查间隔,与目前情况相比,预计可减少1%的生命年,同时节省19%的筛查总费用。结论:增加意大利南部的依从性和协调筛查间隔可以在可接受的成本下获得实质性的改善,或者以更低的成本获得相同的收益。这个例子说明了一种系统方法,可以很容易地应用于其他欧洲国家,因为利益相关者可以使用在线工具来量化各种具体障碍的影响和成本,以及克服这些障碍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信