Meta-analysis of skill-based and therapeutic interventions to address math anxiety

IF 3.8 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101229

Robin S. Codding , Abigail E. Goodridge , Emily Hill , Kourtney R. Kromminga , Reina Chehayeb , Robert J. Volpe , Nicole Scheman

{"title":"Meta-analysis of skill-based and therapeutic interventions to address math anxiety","authors":"Robin S. Codding , Abigail E. Goodridge , Emily Hill , Kourtney R. Kromminga , Reina Chehayeb , Robert J. Volpe , Nicole Scheman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of school-based therapeutic and math skill interventions on math anxiety symptoms and math achievement among K–12 students. Potential moderators included treatment type and study quality. A systematic search yielded 17 included studies representing 1786 primary and secondary students. The results suggested that therapeutic interventions reduced math anxiety symptoms (gav = −0.51) better than math skill interventions (gav = −0.32) and math skill interventions improved math achievement (gav = 0.76) more than therapeutic interventions (gav = 0.12). Moderator analysis indicated that when accounting for study quality, the differences between intervention type were not significant for either of the outcome measures (i.e., achievement and math anxiety). Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.</div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 101229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523000572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of school-based therapeutic and math skill interventions on math anxiety symptoms and math achievement among K–12 students. Potential moderators included treatment type and study quality. A systematic search yielded 17 included studies representing 1786 primary and secondary students. The results suggested that therapeutic interventions reduced math anxiety symptoms (g_av = −0.51) better than math skill interventions (g_av = −0.32) and math skill interventions improved math achievement (g_av = 0.76) more than therapeutic interventions (g_av = 0.12). Moderator analysis indicated that when accounting for study quality, the differences between intervention type were not significant for either of the outcome measures (i.e., achievement and math anxiety). Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于技能和治疗干预措施解决数学焦虑的Meta分析

本荟萃分析的目的是检验学校治疗和数学技能干预对K-12学生数学焦虑症状和数学成绩的影响。潜在的调节因素包括治疗类型和研究质量。一项系统的搜索产生了17项研究，涉及1786名中小学生。结果表明，治疗性干预比数学技能干预（gav=-0.32）更好地减轻了数学焦虑症状（gav=−0.51），数学技能干预比治疗性干预（gav=0.12）更能提高数学成绩（gav=0.76），干预类型之间的差异在两种结果指标（即成绩和数学焦虑）上都不显著。讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

8.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.