Semantic Memory and Creativity: The Costs and Benefits of Semantic Memory Structure in Generating Original Ideas.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Thinking & Reasoning Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1080/13546783.2022.2076742
Roger E Beaty, Yoed N Kenett, Richard W Hass, Daniel L Schacter
{"title":"Semantic Memory and Creativity: The Costs and Benefits of Semantic Memory Structure in Generating Original Ideas.","authors":"Roger E Beaty, Yoed N Kenett, Richard W Hass, Daniel L Schacter","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2022.2076742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its theoretical importance, little is known about how semantic memory structure facilitates and constrains creative idea production. We examine whether the semantic richness of a concept has both benefits and costs to creative idea production. Specifically, we tested whether cue set-size-an index of semantic richness reflecting the average number of elements associated with a given concept-impacts the quantity (fluency) and quality (originality) of responses generated during the alternate uses task (AUT). Across four studies, we show that low-association, sparse, AUT cues benefit originality at the cost of fluency compared to high-association, rich, AUT cues. Furthermore, we found an interaction with individual differences in fluid intelligence in the low-association AUT cues, suggesting that constraints of sparse semantic knowledge can be overcome with top-down intervention. The findings indicate that semantic richness differentially impacts the quality and quantity of generated ideas, and that cognitive control processes can facilitate idea production when conceptual knowledge is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":47270,"journal":{"name":"Thinking & Reasoning","volume":"29 2","pages":"305-339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking & Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2022.2076742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its theoretical importance, little is known about how semantic memory structure facilitates and constrains creative idea production. We examine whether the semantic richness of a concept has both benefits and costs to creative idea production. Specifically, we tested whether cue set-size-an index of semantic richness reflecting the average number of elements associated with a given concept-impacts the quantity (fluency) and quality (originality) of responses generated during the alternate uses task (AUT). Across four studies, we show that low-association, sparse, AUT cues benefit originality at the cost of fluency compared to high-association, rich, AUT cues. Furthermore, we found an interaction with individual differences in fluid intelligence in the low-association AUT cues, suggesting that constraints of sparse semantic knowledge can be overcome with top-down intervention. The findings indicate that semantic richness differentially impacts the quality and quantity of generated ideas, and that cognitive control processes can facilitate idea production when conceptual knowledge is limited.

语义记忆与创造力:语义记忆结构在产生独创性想法方面的成本与收益》(The Costs and Benefits of Semantic Memory Structure in Generating Original Ideas)。
尽管语义记忆结构在理论上非常重要,但人们对其如何促进和制约创意的产生却知之甚少。我们研究了一个概念的语义丰富程度对创意产生是否既有好处又有代价。具体来说,我们测试了线索集大小--反映与特定概念相关的元素平均数量的语义丰富度指数--是否会影响交替使用任务(AUT)中产生的反应的数量(流畅性)和质量(独创性)。通过四项研究,我们发现与关联度高、内容丰富的交替使用任务线索相比,关联度低、内容稀少的交替使用任务线索有利于原创性,而流畅性则是其代价。此外,我们还发现低关联度 AUT 线索与流畅性智能的个体差异之间存在相互作用,这表明稀疏语义知识的限制可以通过自上而下的干预加以克服。研究结果表明,语义的丰富程度会对所产生想法的质量和数量产生不同程度的影响,当概念知识有限时,认知控制过程可以促进想法的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking & Reasoning
Thinking & Reasoning PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信