Assessment of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the chicken digestive tract for potential use as poultry probiotics.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Merisa Sirisopapong, Takeshi Shimosato, Supattra Okrathok, Sutisa Khempaka
{"title":"Assessment of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the chicken digestive tract for potential use as poultry probiotics.","authors":"Merisa Sirisopapong,&nbsp;Takeshi Shimosato,&nbsp;Supattra Okrathok,&nbsp;Sutisa Khempaka","doi":"10.5713/ab.22.0455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics in animal feed has received considerable attention in recent decades. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have remarkable functional properties promoting host health and are major microorganisms for probiotic purposes. The aim of this study was to characterize LAB strains of the chicken digestive tract and to determine their functional properties for further use as potential probiotics in poultry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,000 colonies were isolated from the ileum and cecal contents of the chickens based on their phenotypic profiles and followed by a preliminary detection for acid and bile tolerance. The selected 200 LAB isolates with exhibited well-tolerance in acid and bile conditions were then identified by sequencing the 16S rDNA gene, followed by acid and bile tolerance, antimicrobial activity, adhesion to epithelial cells and additional characteristics on the removal of cholesterol. Then, the two probiotic strains (L. ingluviei and L. salivarious) which showed the greatest advantage in vitro testing were selected to assess their efficacy in broiler chickens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 200 LAB isolates that complied with all measurement criteria belonged to five strains, including L. acidophilus (63 colonies), L. ingluviei (2 colonies), L. reuteri (58 colonies), L. salivarius (72 colonies), and L. saerimneri (5 colonies). We found that the L. ingluviei and L. salivarius can increase the population of LAB and Bifidobacterium spp. while reducing Enterobacteria spp. and Escherichia coli in the cecal content of chickens. Additionally, increased concentrations of valeric acid and short chain fatty acids were also observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that all five Lactobacillus strains isolated from gut contents of chickens are safe and possess probiotic properties, especially L. ingluviei and L. salivarius. Future studies should evaluate the potential for growth improvement in broilers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":"36 8","pages":"1209-1220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330982/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The use of probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics in animal feed has received considerable attention in recent decades. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have remarkable functional properties promoting host health and are major microorganisms for probiotic purposes. The aim of this study was to characterize LAB strains of the chicken digestive tract and to determine their functional properties for further use as potential probiotics in poultry.

Methods: A total of 2,000 colonies were isolated from the ileum and cecal contents of the chickens based on their phenotypic profiles and followed by a preliminary detection for acid and bile tolerance. The selected 200 LAB isolates with exhibited well-tolerance in acid and bile conditions were then identified by sequencing the 16S rDNA gene, followed by acid and bile tolerance, antimicrobial activity, adhesion to epithelial cells and additional characteristics on the removal of cholesterol. Then, the two probiotic strains (L. ingluviei and L. salivarious) which showed the greatest advantage in vitro testing were selected to assess their efficacy in broiler chickens.

Results: It was found that 200 LAB isolates that complied with all measurement criteria belonged to five strains, including L. acidophilus (63 colonies), L. ingluviei (2 colonies), L. reuteri (58 colonies), L. salivarius (72 colonies), and L. saerimneri (5 colonies). We found that the L. ingluviei and L. salivarius can increase the population of LAB and Bifidobacterium spp. while reducing Enterobacteria spp. and Escherichia coli in the cecal content of chickens. Additionally, increased concentrations of valeric acid and short chain fatty acids were also observed.

Conclusion: This study indicates that all five Lactobacillus strains isolated from gut contents of chickens are safe and possess probiotic properties, especially L. ingluviei and L. salivarius. Future studies should evaluate the potential for growth improvement in broilers.

Abstract Image

从鸡消化道分离的乳酸菌作为家禽益生菌的潜力评价。
目的:近几十年来,在动物饲料中使用益生菌作为抗生素的替代品受到了广泛的关注。乳酸菌具有显著的促进宿主健康的功能特性,是益生菌的主要微生物。本研究的目的是对鸡消化道的乳酸菌进行鉴定,并确定其功能特性,以便进一步作为潜在的益生菌在家禽中使用。方法:根据鸡的表型特征,从鸡的回肠和盲肠内容物中分离出2000个菌落,并进行酸和胆汁耐受性的初步检测。选择200株在酸和胆汁条件下表现出良好耐受性的LAB菌株,然后通过16S rDNA基因测序,随后进行酸和胆汁耐受性,抗菌活性,对上皮细胞的粘附性和去除胆固醇的其他特性进行鉴定。然后,选择体外试验中表现出最大优势的两株益生菌(L. ingluviei和L. salivari),对其在肉鸡体内的功效进行评价。结果:200株符合各项检测标准的乳酸菌分5个菌株,分别为嗜酸乳杆菌(63个菌落)、ingluviei乳杆菌(2个菌落)、罗伊氏乳杆菌(58个菌落)、唾液乳杆菌(72个菌落)和沙氏乳杆菌(5个菌落)。我们发现,英格鲁维乳杆菌和唾液乳杆菌可以增加乳酸菌和双歧杆菌的数量,同时减少肠杆菌和大肠杆菌在鸡盲肠内容物中的数量。此外,还观察到戊酸和短链脂肪酸浓度升高。结论:从鸡肠道内容物中分离得到的5株乳杆菌均具有良好的益生菌特性,其中以L. ingluviei和L. salivarius最为突出。未来的研究应评估其改善肉鸡生长的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信