Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yanshuo Wu, Congcong Zhao, Meirong Sun, Jingjing Bu, Zhenjie Hu, Yanling Yin
{"title":"Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.","authors":"Yanshuo Wu,&nbsp;Congcong Zhao,&nbsp;Meirong Sun,&nbsp;Jingjing Bu,&nbsp;Zhenjie Hu,&nbsp;Yanling Yin","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of modifying the cuff on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of a new type of cuff intubation with traditional cuff intubation on VAP incidence and intensive-care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Nine RCTs with 1937 patients were finally evaluated. The pooled results for the incidence of VAP showed that the modified cuff significantly decreased the morbidity of VAP compared with the traditional cuff (relative ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that polyurethane (PU) cuff (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.48, p = 0.52), conical cuff (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p = 0.82) and PU-conical cuff (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.18, p = 0.20) did not decrease the incidence of VAP. Moreover, the improved cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) could significantly reduce the VAP incidence (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001). In terms of ICU mortality, there was no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.02, p = 0.08) between the two groups. The modified cuff is superior to the traditional cuff in VAP prevention. In particular, the modified cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage has more advantages. Key Words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intubation, Endotracheal cuff, Intensive care unit, Meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of modifying the cuff on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of a new type of cuff intubation with traditional cuff intubation on VAP incidence and intensive-care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. Nine RCTs with 1937 patients were finally evaluated. The pooled results for the incidence of VAP showed that the modified cuff significantly decreased the morbidity of VAP compared with the traditional cuff (relative ratio (RR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis revealed that polyurethane (PU) cuff (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46-1.48, p = 0.52), conical cuff (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p = 0.82) and PU-conical cuff (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.18, p = 0.20) did not decrease the incidence of VAP. Moreover, the improved cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) could significantly reduce the VAP incidence (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001). In terms of ICU mortality, there was no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.02, p = 0.08) between the two groups. The modified cuff is superior to the traditional cuff in VAP prevention. In particular, the modified cuff combined with subglottic secretion drainage has more advantages. Key Words: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intubation, Endotracheal cuff, Intensive care unit, Meta-analysis.

改良气管插管袖口预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效。
本研究的目的是评估改良袖带对预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的效果。PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆系统检索了从成立到2022年4月的随机对照试验(rct),比较了新型袖带插管与传统袖带插管对机械通气患者VAP发生率和重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率的影响。9项随机对照试验共1937例患者最终评估。VAP发生率汇总结果显示,改良袖带较传统袖带明显降低VAP发病率(相对比(RR) = 0.73, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.56 ~ 0.95, p = 0.02)。亚组分析显示,聚氨酯(PU)袖带(RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.46 ~ 1.48, p = 0.52)、锥形袖带(RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73 ~ 1.28, p = 0.82)和PU-锥形袖带(RR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.85 ~ 2.18, p = 0.20)并没有降低VAP的发生率。改良袖带联合声门下分泌物引流(SSD)可显著降低VAP发生率(RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p = 0.0001)。ICU病死率方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义(RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.68 ~ 1.02, p = 0.08)。改良袖带在预防VAP方面优于传统袖带。特别是改良袖带结合声门下分泌物引流更有优势。关键词:呼吸机相关性肺炎,插管,气管内袖带,重症监护病房,meta分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991. Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信