Recurrent Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy or Ablation: Should We Observe Them All? Results from a Large Multicenter Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Consortium

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
{"title":"Recurrent Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy or Ablation: Should We Observe Them All? Results from a Large Multicenter Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Consortium","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) yields poor functional outcomes and relatively high complication rates. Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) has genetic and clinical features showing little, if not absent, metastatic potential. However, the behavior of GS 6 PCa recurring after previous PCa treatment including radiotherapy and/or ablation has not been investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the oncological outcomes of sRP for radio- and/or ablation-recurrent GS 6 PCa.</p></div><div><h3>Design, setting, and participants</h3><p>Retrospective data of sRP for recurrent PCa after local nonsurgical treatment were collected from 14 tertiary referral centers from 2000 to 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Prostate biopsy before sRP and sRP.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis</h3><p>A survival analysis was performed for pre-sRP biopsy and sRP-proven GS 6. Concordance between PCa at pre-sRP biopsy and sRP histology was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results and limitations</h3><p>We included GS 6 recurrent PCa at pre-sRP biopsy (<em>n</em> = 142) and at sRP (<em>n</em> = 50), as two cohorts. The majority had primary radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy (83.8% of GS 6 patients at pre-sRP biopsy; 78% of GS 6 patients at sRP) and whole-gland treatments (91% biopsy; 85.1% sRP). Biopsy GS 6 10-yr metastasis, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–89%), 98% (95–99%), and 89% (78–95%), respectively. Upgrading at sRP was 69%, 35.5% had a pT3 stage, and 13.4% had positive nodes. The sRP GS 6 10-yr metastasis-free survival, CSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, and 90% (95% CI 58–98%) respectively; pT3 and pN1 disease were found in 12% and 0%, respectively. Overall complications, high-grade complications, and severe incontinence were experienced by &gt;50%, &gt;10%, and &gt;15% of men, respectively (in both the biopsy and the sRP cohorts). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and absence of a centralized pathological review.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GS 6 sRP–proven PCa recurring after nonsurgical primary treatment has almost no metastatic potential, while patients experience relevant morbidity of the procedure. However, a significant proportion of GS 6 cases at pre-sRP biopsy are upgraded at sRP. In the idea not to overtreat, efforts should be made to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pre-sRP biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><p>We investigated the oncological results of salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer of Gleason score (GS) 6 category. We found a very low malignant potential of GS 6 confirmed at salvage radical prostatectomy despite surgical complications being relatively high. Nonetheless, biopsy GS 6 was frequently upgraded and had less optimal oncological control. Overtreatment for recurrent GS 6 after nonsurgical first-line treatment should be avoided, and efforts should be made to increase the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies for recurrent disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456923001943/pdfft?md5=8b40df7c606a5dbbb844f46ce29cd8a6&pid=1-s2.0-S2405456923001943-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456923001943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) yields poor functional outcomes and relatively high complication rates. Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) has genetic and clinical features showing little, if not absent, metastatic potential. However, the behavior of GS 6 PCa recurring after previous PCa treatment including radiotherapy and/or ablation has not been investigated.

Objective

To evaluate the oncological outcomes of sRP for radio- and/or ablation-recurrent GS 6 PCa.

Design, setting, and participants

Retrospective data of sRP for recurrent PCa after local nonsurgical treatment were collected from 14 tertiary referral centers from 2000 to 2021.

Intervention

Prostate biopsy before sRP and sRP.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

A survival analysis was performed for pre-sRP biopsy and sRP-proven GS 6. Concordance between PCa at pre-sRP biopsy and sRP histology was assessed.

Results and limitations

We included GS 6 recurrent PCa at pre-sRP biopsy (n = 142) and at sRP (n = 50), as two cohorts. The majority had primary radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy (83.8% of GS 6 patients at pre-sRP biopsy; 78% of GS 6 patients at sRP) and whole-gland treatments (91% biopsy; 85.1% sRP). Biopsy GS 6 10-yr metastasis, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–89%), 98% (95–99%), and 89% (78–95%), respectively. Upgrading at sRP was 69%, 35.5% had a pT3 stage, and 13.4% had positive nodes. The sRP GS 6 10-yr metastasis-free survival, CSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, and 90% (95% CI 58–98%) respectively; pT3 and pN1 disease were found in 12% and 0%, respectively. Overall complications, high-grade complications, and severe incontinence were experienced by >50%, >10%, and >15% of men, respectively (in both the biopsy and the sRP cohorts). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and absence of a centralized pathological review.

Conclusions

GS 6 sRP–proven PCa recurring after nonsurgical primary treatment has almost no metastatic potential, while patients experience relevant morbidity of the procedure. However, a significant proportion of GS 6 cases at pre-sRP biopsy are upgraded at sRP. In the idea not to overtreat, efforts should be made to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pre-sRP biopsy.

Patient summary

We investigated the oncological results of salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer of Gleason score (GS) 6 category. We found a very low malignant potential of GS 6 confirmed at salvage radical prostatectomy despite surgical complications being relatively high. Nonetheless, biopsy GS 6 was frequently upgraded and had less optimal oncological control. Overtreatment for recurrent GS 6 after nonsurgical first-line treatment should be avoided, and efforts should be made to increase the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies for recurrent disease.

放疗或消融术后复发的格里森评分 6 级前列腺癌:我们是否应该全部观察?大型多中心挽救性前列腺癌根治术联合会的研究结果
背景前列腺癌根治术(sRP)的功能效果不佳,并发症发生率相对较高。格里森评分(GS)6 的前列腺癌(PCa)具有遗传和临床特征,几乎没有转移潜力。目的评估sRP治疗放疗和/或消融后复发的GS 6 PCa的肿瘤学效果。设计、环境和参与者2000年至2021年期间,从14个三级转诊中心收集了sRP治疗局部非手术治疗后复发PCa的回顾性数据。 干预sRP前和sRP前的前列腺活检结果测量和统计分析对sRP前活检和sRP证实的GS 6进行了生存分析。结果和局限性我们将SRP活检前(n = 142)和SRP时(n = 50)的GS 6复发性PCa作为两个队列。大多数患者接受了原发性放疗和/或近距离放射治疗(活检前GS 6患者中83.8%;活检时GS 6患者中78%)和全腺治疗(活检时91%;活检时85.1%)。活检GS 6 10年转移率、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)分别为79%(95%置信区间[CI] 61-89%)、98%(95-99%)和89%(78-95%)。sRP时的升级率为69%,35.5%为pT3分期,13.4%为阳性结节。sRP GS 6 10年无转移生存率、CSS和OS分别为100%、100%和90%(95% CI 58-98%);发现pT3和pN1疾病的比例分别为12%和0%。50%、10%和15%的男性(活检组和sRP组)出现了总体并发症、高级别并发症和严重尿失禁。结论GS 6经sRP证实的PCa在非手术原发治疗后复发,几乎没有转移的可能性,同时患者也会经历相关的发病率。然而,在SRP前活检的GS 6病例中,有相当一部分在SRP时得到了升级。为了避免过度治疗,应努力提高前列腺癌根治术前活检的诊断准确性。患者摘要我们研究了对格里森评分(GS)6级的复发性前列腺癌进行挽救性前列腺癌根治术的肿瘤学结果。我们发现,尽管手术并发症相对较高,但经挽救性前列腺癌根治术证实的 GS 6 恶性潜能极低。然而,活检发现的 GS 6 经常升级,且肿瘤控制效果不理想。应避免对非手术一线治疗后复发的GS 6进行过度治疗,并应努力提高活检对复发疾病诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信