Severe asthma: follow-up after one year from the Italian Registry on Severe Asthma (IRSA)

IF 2.6 Q2 ALLERGY
M B Bilò, M Martini, L Antonicelli, M Aliani, M Carone, L Cecchi, F de Michele, G Polese, A Vaghi, A Musarra, C Micheletto
{"title":"Severe asthma: follow-up after one year from the Italian Registry on Severe Asthma (IRSA)","authors":"M B Bilò,&nbsp;M Martini,&nbsp;L Antonicelli,&nbsp;M Aliani,&nbsp;M Carone,&nbsp;L Cecchi,&nbsp;F de Michele,&nbsp;G Polese,&nbsp;A Vaghi,&nbsp;A Musarra,&nbsp;C Micheletto","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Asthma affects millions of people worldwide, with a subgroup suffering from severe asthma (SA). Biologics have revolutionized SA treatment, but challenges remain in managing different patient traits. This study analyzed data from the Italian Registry on Severe Asthma (IRSA) to investigate changes in SA characteristics and effectiveness of treatments after one year of follow-up, and to identify factors associated with response to treatments in a real-world setting. <b>Methods.</b> Data on SA patients with one year of follow-up were extracted from IRSA. Asthma control, exacerbations, lung function, and treatments, were assessed at follow-up and analyzed against baseline characteristics. <b>Results.</b> After one year of follow-up, notable improvements were observed in all the outcomes of SA of the included patients (n = 570). The effectiveness of biologic therapies was particularly evident, as they contributed significantly to these positive outcomes. Additionally, certain factors were found to be associated with improvement, namely T2 phenotype, baseline eosinophil count (BEC), and area of residence. On the other hand, comorbidities (obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease) and poor lung function were risk factors. Notably, poor-responders to biologics exhibited lower level of education, BEC, and exacerbations, and higher frequency of atopy and ACT score ≥ 20. <b>Conclusions.</b> The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of biologics in asthma management, when implemented as part of a planned follow-up strategy aimed at optimizing and fine-tuning the therapy. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of considering key traits such as the T2 phenotype, BEC, education, and comorbidities when tailoring SA treatment. Overall, this study contributes to enhancing our understanding of SA management and guiding the development of personalized treatment approaches for patients with SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":"55 5","pages":"199-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Asthma affects millions of people worldwide, with a subgroup suffering from severe asthma (SA). Biologics have revolutionized SA treatment, but challenges remain in managing different patient traits. This study analyzed data from the Italian Registry on Severe Asthma (IRSA) to investigate changes in SA characteristics and effectiveness of treatments after one year of follow-up, and to identify factors associated with response to treatments in a real-world setting. Methods. Data on SA patients with one year of follow-up were extracted from IRSA. Asthma control, exacerbations, lung function, and treatments, were assessed at follow-up and analyzed against baseline characteristics. Results. After one year of follow-up, notable improvements were observed in all the outcomes of SA of the included patients (n = 570). The effectiveness of biologic therapies was particularly evident, as they contributed significantly to these positive outcomes. Additionally, certain factors were found to be associated with improvement, namely T2 phenotype, baseline eosinophil count (BEC), and area of residence. On the other hand, comorbidities (obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease) and poor lung function were risk factors. Notably, poor-responders to biologics exhibited lower level of education, BEC, and exacerbations, and higher frequency of atopy and ACT score ≥ 20. Conclusions. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of biologics in asthma management, when implemented as part of a planned follow-up strategy aimed at optimizing and fine-tuning the therapy. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of considering key traits such as the T2 phenotype, BEC, education, and comorbidities when tailoring SA treatment. Overall, this study contributes to enhancing our understanding of SA management and guiding the development of personalized treatment approaches for patients with SA.

严重哮喘:意大利严重哮喘登记处(IRSA)一年后的随访
摘要:背景。哮喘影响着全世界数百万人,其中一个亚组患有严重哮喘。生物制品已经彻底改变了SA治疗,但在管理不同的患者特征方面仍然存在挑战。这项研究分析了意大利严重哮喘登记处(IRSA)的数据,以调查一年随访后SA特征和治疗有效性的变化,并确定现实世界中与治疗反应相关的因素。方法。SA患者随访一年的数据取自IRSA。在随访时评估哮喘控制、加重、肺功能和治疗,并对照基线特征进行分析。后果经过一年的随访,观察到纳入患者(n=570)SA的所有结果都有显著改善。生物疗法的有效性尤其明显,因为它们对这些积极的结果做出了重大贡献。此外,发现某些因素与改善有关,即T2表型、基线嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)和居住面积。另一方面,合并症(肥胖、胃食管反流病)和肺功能差是危险因素。值得注意的是,生物制剂的不良反应者表现出较低的教育水平、BEC和病情恶化,特应性和ACT评分≥20的频率较高。结论。这些发现证明了生物制剂在哮喘管理中的有效性,当作为旨在优化和微调治疗的计划随访策略的一部分实施时。此外,该研究强调了在调整SA治疗时考虑T2表型、BEC、教育和合并症等关键特征的重要性。总的来说,这项研究有助于增强我们对SA管理的理解,并指导SA患者个性化治疗方法的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信