Impact of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) on secondary sludge microorganisms: removal, potential toxicity, and their implications on existing wastewater treatment regulations in Canada

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Zanina Ilieva, Patricia Hania, Roxana Suehring, Kimberley Gilbride and Rania Hamza
{"title":"Impact of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) on secondary sludge microorganisms: removal, potential toxicity, and their implications on existing wastewater treatment regulations in Canada","authors":"Zanina Ilieva, Patricia Hania, Roxana Suehring, Kimberley Gilbride and Rania Hamza","doi":"10.1039/D3EM00202K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) are two of the most commonly researched per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Globally, many long-chain PFAS compounds including PFOS and PFOA are highly regulated and, in some countries, PFAS use in commercial products is strictly prohibited. Despite the legal regulation of these ‘forever chemicals’ under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, PFOA and PFOS compounds are still found in high concentrations in discharges from wastewater treatment plants, both from liquid and sludge streams. Yet, their potential impact on wastewater treatment effectiveness remains poorly understood. The findings of this research show that: (1) PFOS and PFOA might be hindering the overall outcome treatment performance – calling into question the efficacy of Canada's existing wastewater treatment regulatory standard (Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations, SOR/2012-139), and (2) specific microorganisms from the <em>Thiobacillus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> genera seem capable of adsorbing PFOS and PFOA onto their cell wall and even degrading the chemicals, but it is unclear as to what extent degradation occurs. The results also raise questions whether existing wastewater regulations should be expanded to include the detection and monitoring of PFAS, as well as the establishment of a regulatory wastewater treatment plant discharge standard for PFAS that is protective of human and ecological health.</p>","PeriodicalId":74,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","volume":" 10","pages":" 1604-1614"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/em/d3em00202k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) are two of the most commonly researched per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Globally, many long-chain PFAS compounds including PFOS and PFOA are highly regulated and, in some countries, PFAS use in commercial products is strictly prohibited. Despite the legal regulation of these ‘forever chemicals’ under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, PFOA and PFOS compounds are still found in high concentrations in discharges from wastewater treatment plants, both from liquid and sludge streams. Yet, their potential impact on wastewater treatment effectiveness remains poorly understood. The findings of this research show that: (1) PFOS and PFOA might be hindering the overall outcome treatment performance – calling into question the efficacy of Canada's existing wastewater treatment regulatory standard (Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations, SOR/2012-139), and (2) specific microorganisms from the Thiobacillus and Pseudomonas genera seem capable of adsorbing PFOS and PFOA onto their cell wall and even degrading the chemicals, but it is unclear as to what extent degradation occurs. The results also raise questions whether existing wastewater regulations should be expanded to include the detection and monitoring of PFAS, as well as the establishment of a regulatory wastewater treatment plant discharge standard for PFAS that is protective of human and ecological health.

Abstract Image

全氟辛酸和全氟辛烷磺酸对次级污泥微生物的影响:去除、潜在毒性及其对加拿大现有废水处理法规的影响
全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)是研究最常见的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)。在全球范围内,包括全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷酸在内的许多长链全氟辛烷值化合物都受到严格监管,在一些国家,商业产品中严格禁止使用全氟辛烷。尽管《加拿大环境保护法》对这些“永久性化学品”进行了法律监管,但在废水处理厂的排放物中,无论是液体流还是污泥流,全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷氧化合物的浓度仍然很高。然而,它们对废水处理效果的潜在影响仍知之甚少。这项研究的结果表明:(1)全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷酸可能阻碍了整体结果处理性能——这使人们对加拿大现有废水处理监管标准(《废水系统排放条例》,SOR/2012-139)的有效性产生了质疑,和(2)硫杆菌属和假单胞菌属的特定微生物似乎能够将全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷酸吸附到细胞壁上,甚至降解化学物质,但尚不清楚降解的程度。研究结果还提出了一个问题,即是否应该扩大现有的废水法规,包括全氟辛烷磺酸的检测和监测,以及建立一个保护人类和生态健康的全氟辛烷酸废水处理厂排放标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
202
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts publishes high quality papers in all areas of the environmental chemical sciences, including chemistry of the air, water, soil and sediment. We welcome studies on the environmental fate and effects of anthropogenic and naturally occurring contaminants, both chemical and microbiological, as well as related natural element cycling processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信