Abbreviated breast MRI for evaluating breast cancer before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Arvin Arian , Mohamad Ghazanfari Hashemi , Vahid Talebi , Nasrin AhmadiNejad , Bita Eslami , Nahid Sedighi , Ramesh Omranipour
{"title":"Abbreviated breast MRI for evaluating breast cancer before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Arvin Arian ,&nbsp;Mohamad Ghazanfari Hashemi ,&nbsp;Vahid Talebi ,&nbsp;Nasrin AhmadiNejad ,&nbsp;Bita Eslami ,&nbsp;Nahid Sedighi ,&nbsp;Ramesh Omranipour","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although, there are accumulating evidence about diagnostic role of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in screening setting, the implementation of abbreviated MRI in staging of breast cancer has been poorly elucidated.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI in estimating extent of disease before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 54 patients with biopsy-proven main lesion referred to evaluate by standard protocol breast MRI before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. From a standard protocol, a data set of abbreviated protocol consisting fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1W) pre-contrast and first two fat-saturated T1W post-contrast series with reconstruction of their subtraction including maximum intensity projection (MIP) were obtained and interpreted. The concordance rate of abbreviated with standard protocol (as a reference standard) were compared. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated, as well.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The maximum size of the main mass was 38.6 ± 17.3 and 40.7 ± 17.9 for abbreviated and standard protocol, respectively. All of the main mass was detected by abbreviated protocol with 100% concordance. Concordance was 98.1% and 94.4% in terms of multifocal/multicentric status and for estimating of NME, respectively. The abbreviated protocol has high sensitivity and specificity with more than 90% value regarding main mass detection, measurement of the maximum size of the main mass, determination of multifocal/multicenter status and NAC involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Abbreviated protocol may be a reliable surrogate for standard protocol breast MRI in evaluating extent of breast cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/02/main.PMC10440387.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although, there are accumulating evidence about diagnostic role of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in screening setting, the implementation of abbreviated MRI in staging of breast cancer has been poorly elucidated.

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI in estimating extent of disease before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 54 patients with biopsy-proven main lesion referred to evaluate by standard protocol breast MRI before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. From a standard protocol, a data set of abbreviated protocol consisting fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1W) pre-contrast and first two fat-saturated T1W post-contrast series with reconstruction of their subtraction including maximum intensity projection (MIP) were obtained and interpreted. The concordance rate of abbreviated with standard protocol (as a reference standard) were compared. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated, as well.

Results

The maximum size of the main mass was 38.6 ± 17.3 and 40.7 ± 17.9 for abbreviated and standard protocol, respectively. All of the main mass was detected by abbreviated protocol with 100% concordance. Concordance was 98.1% and 94.4% in terms of multifocal/multicentric status and for estimating of NME, respectively. The abbreviated protocol has high sensitivity and specificity with more than 90% value regarding main mass detection, measurement of the maximum size of the main mass, determination of multifocal/multicenter status and NAC involvement.

Conclusion

Abbreviated protocol may be a reliable surrogate for standard protocol breast MRI in evaluating extent of breast cancer.

一项横断面研究:在新辅助化疗开始前对乳腺癌进行简短的乳房MRI评估
背景:虽然有越来越多的证据表明缩短乳房磁共振成像(MRI)在筛查中的诊断作用,但缩短MRI在乳腺癌分期中的应用尚不清楚。目的探讨乳腺MRI在新辅助化疗前对病变程度的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析54例经活检证实的主要病变,在新辅助化疗开始前经标准方案乳腺MRI评估的患者。从标准方案中,获得由脂肪饱和t1加权(T1W)前对比序列和前两个脂肪饱和T1W后对比序列组成的简化方案数据集,并对其减法进行重建,包括最大强度投影(MIP)。比较其与标准方案(作为参考标准)的符合率。计算诊断的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果简化方案和标准方案的最大主肿块大小分别为38.6±17.3和40.7±17.9。所有主要肿块均采用简化方案检测,一致性为100%。在多焦点/多中心状态和估计NME方面,一致性分别为98.1%和94.4%。简化方案在主肿块的检测、主肿块最大尺寸的测量、多灶/多中心状态的确定和NAC受累方面具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,90%以上。结论简化方案可替代标准方案乳腺MRI评估乳腺癌的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信