Endometrial thickness and live birth rates after IVF: a systematic review.

Q2 Medicine
Gaukhar Moshkalova, Indira Karibayeva, Almagul Kurmanova, Nagima Mamedalieva, Aliya Aimbetova, Aigul Terlikbayeva, Arzu Mamutova, Zarina Yerzhan, Sandugash Yerkenova, Balgyn Zheksembay
{"title":"Endometrial thickness and live birth rates after IVF: a systematic review.","authors":"Gaukhar Moshkalova, Indira Karibayeva, Almagul Kurmanova, Nagima Mamedalieva, Aliya Aimbetova, Aigul Terlikbayeva, Arzu Mamutova, Zarina Yerzhan, Sandugash Yerkenova, Balgyn Zheksembay","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94i3.14437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to systematically review the current literature on published studies with data on the clinical significance of endometrial thickness on ultrasound for live birth rates after IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Open Gray databases, and following hand-search of the reference list of the included studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 20 eligible studies that evaluated 20 546 patients for endometrial thickness, presented risk factors for decreased endometrial receptivity, and IVF outcomes with fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The mean age of the patients ranged from 28.86 to 41.03 years. Reported endometrial thickness ranged from <4 mm to >15 mm. The clinical pregnancy rate varied from 9,09% to 61,49% in fresh embryo transfer cycles and from 13,3% to 79,31% in FET cycles. Overall, LBR varied between 4,80% and 48,99% in fresh embryo cycles and between 6.06% and 39,19% in FET cycles.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Only English-language studies were included; most studies were from the China region; retrospective study design used in most studies; different ET thresholds, which in turn could significantly alter the correlation with pregnancy outcomes; different IVF procedure protocols in fresh or FET cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVF outcomes in patients with impaired endometrial receptivity do not depend only on the condition of the endometrium. Risk factors and endometrial thickness significantly affect LBR in fresh and FET cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":"94 3","pages":"e2023152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/25/ACTA-94-152.PMC10308470.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i3.14437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to systematically review the current literature on published studies with data on the clinical significance of endometrial thickness on ultrasound for live birth rates after IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Methods: An extensive systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Open Gray databases, and following hand-search of the reference list of the included studies was performed.

Results: We found 20 eligible studies that evaluated 20 546 patients for endometrial thickness, presented risk factors for decreased endometrial receptivity, and IVF outcomes with fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The mean age of the patients ranged from 28.86 to 41.03 years. Reported endometrial thickness ranged from <4 mm to >15 mm. The clinical pregnancy rate varied from 9,09% to 61,49% in fresh embryo transfer cycles and from 13,3% to 79,31% in FET cycles. Overall, LBR varied between 4,80% and 48,99% in fresh embryo cycles and between 6.06% and 39,19% in FET cycles.

Limitations: Only English-language studies were included; most studies were from the China region; retrospective study design used in most studies; different ET thresholds, which in turn could significantly alter the correlation with pregnancy outcomes; different IVF procedure protocols in fresh or FET cycles.

Conclusions: IVF outcomes in patients with impaired endometrial receptivity do not depend only on the condition of the endometrium. Risk factors and endometrial thickness significantly affect LBR in fresh and FET cycles.

Abstract Image

体外受精后子宫内膜厚度和活产率:系统综述。
目的:本研究旨在系统回顾目前已发表的关于子宫内膜厚度超声对IVF或ICSI后活产率的临床意义的研究文献。方法:对PubMed、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar和Open Gray数据库进行广泛的系统综述,并对纳入研究的参考文献列表进行手动检索。结果:我们发现了20项符合条件的研究,评估了20546例患者的子宫内膜厚度、子宫内膜容受性下降的危险因素以及新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期的IVF结果。患者平均年龄28.86 ~ 41.03岁。报告的子宫内膜厚度从15mm不等。新鲜胚胎移植周期的临床妊娠率为9.09% ~ 61.49%,FET周期的临床妊娠率为13.3% ~ 79.31%。总体而言,新鲜胚胎周期的LBR变化在4.80%至48.99%之间,FET周期的LBR变化在6.06%至39.19%之间。局限性:仅包括英语研究;大多数研究来自中国地区;大多数研究采用回顾性研究设计;不同的ET阈值,这反过来又可能显著改变与妊娠结局的相关性;在新鲜或FET周期中不同的试管婴儿程序方案。结论:子宫内膜容受性受损患者的体外受精结果不仅仅取决于子宫内膜的状况。危险因素和子宫内膜厚度显著影响新鲜和FET周期的LBR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信