YouTube™ as a source of tooth avulsion information: A video analysis study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1111/edt.12873
Jéssica Muniz Loureiro, Victor Carvalho Vitolo Chaves, Patrícia A Risso, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia, Matheus de Melo Pithon
{"title":"YouTube™ as a source of tooth avulsion information: A video analysis study.","authors":"Jéssica Muniz Loureiro, Victor Carvalho Vitolo Chaves, Patrícia A Risso, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia, Matheus de Melo Pithon","doi":"10.1111/edt.12873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Evaluate the informative content in tooth avulsion videos intended for dentists available on YouTube™ and analyse their compliance with the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines 2020.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Google Trends was used to identify the most searched term for tooth avulsion. Tooth avulsion-related videos in Brazilian Portuguese intended for dentists were searched on YouTube™ with a 12-month filter. Two raters reviewed these videos to extract their features and evaluate and qualify them with two 9-point checklists based on the IADT 2020 guidelines. The emergency steps for tooth avulsion at the accident site were assessed before, during and after clinical management; each step received 1 point if present and 0 points if absent. The final score ranged from 0 to 9 points on each checklist (18 points total), and the total score was used to classify the videos as having poor, moderate or rich content. Reliability and video quality were evaluated by an adapted version of the DISCERN tool and global quality scale (GQS), respectively. The data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-test, Pearson chi-square test, and the Kappa statistic (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 60 videos, 8 were included. All were uploaded by dental professionals or undergraduate students; the average duration was 11 min (range: 0.40-65 min), and the average number of views was 56.75. Half the videos (50%) had maximum completeness scores for questions about emergency dentist referral before clinical management, and more than half (75%) had maximum completeness regarding the steps required during and after treatment. Rich videos had higher GQS scores (p = .049) without significant correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although most videos in Brazilian Portuguese were considered high-quality according to the IADT checklist, half of them presented partial absence of information regarding orientations at the accident site.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background/aim: Evaluate the informative content in tooth avulsion videos intended for dentists available on YouTube™ and analyse their compliance with the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines 2020.

Materials and methods: Google Trends was used to identify the most searched term for tooth avulsion. Tooth avulsion-related videos in Brazilian Portuguese intended for dentists were searched on YouTube™ with a 12-month filter. Two raters reviewed these videos to extract their features and evaluate and qualify them with two 9-point checklists based on the IADT 2020 guidelines. The emergency steps for tooth avulsion at the accident site were assessed before, during and after clinical management; each step received 1 point if present and 0 points if absent. The final score ranged from 0 to 9 points on each checklist (18 points total), and the total score was used to classify the videos as having poor, moderate or rich content. Reliability and video quality were evaluated by an adapted version of the DISCERN tool and global quality scale (GQS), respectively. The data were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-test, Pearson chi-square test, and the Kappa statistic (p < .05).

Results: Of 60 videos, 8 were included. All were uploaded by dental professionals or undergraduate students; the average duration was 11 min (range: 0.40-65 min), and the average number of views was 56.75. Half the videos (50%) had maximum completeness scores for questions about emergency dentist referral before clinical management, and more than half (75%) had maximum completeness regarding the steps required during and after treatment. Rich videos had higher GQS scores (p = .049) without significant correlation.

Conclusions: Although most videos in Brazilian Portuguese were considered high-quality according to the IADT checklist, half of them presented partial absence of information regarding orientations at the accident site.

YouTube™作为牙齿撕脱信息的来源:视频分析研究。
背景/目的:评估YouTube™上为牙医提供的牙齿撕脱视频中的信息内容,并分析其对2020年国际牙科创伤学协会(IADT)指南的遵从性。材料和方法:谷歌Trends用于识别牙齿撕脱伤的搜索次数最多的术语。在YouTube™上使用12个月过滤器搜索为牙医准备的巴西葡萄牙语牙齿撕脱相关视频。两名评分员对这些视频进行了审查,以提取其特征,并根据IADT 2020指南使用两个9点清单对其进行评估和鉴定。评估临床处理前、中、后事故现场牙齿撕脱的应急措施;每个步骤如果有,得1分,如果没有,得0分。每个检查表的最终得分范围为0到9分(总分为18分),并用总分将视频分为内容差、中等和丰富三类。可靠性和视频质量分别通过适应版的DISCERN工具和全球质量量表(GQS)进行评估。采用Mann-Whitney u检验、Pearson卡方检验和Kappa统计量(p)对数据进行分析。结果:60个视频中有8个被纳入。全部由牙科专业人士或本科生上传;平均时长为11分钟(范围:0.40-65分钟),平均观看次数为56.75次。一半的视频(50%)在临床管理前关于紧急牙医转诊的问题上获得了最高的完整性分数,一半以上的视频(75%)在治疗期间和治疗后所需的步骤上获得了最高的完整性分数。视频内容丰富者GQS得分较高(p = 0.049),但相关性不显著。结论:尽管根据IADT检查表,大多数巴西葡萄牙语视频被认为是高质量的,但其中一半的视频显示部分缺乏有关事故现场方向的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信