The adoption of conservation practices in the Corn Belt: the role of one formal farmer network, Practical Farmers of Iowa

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. Asprooth, M. Norton, R. Galt
{"title":"The adoption of conservation practices in the Corn Belt: the role of one formal farmer network, Practical Farmers of Iowa","authors":"L. Asprooth,&nbsp;M. Norton,&nbsp;R. Galt","doi":"10.1007/s10460-023-10451-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Substantial evidence has shown that involvement in peer-to-peer farming networks influences whether a farmer decides to try a new practice. Formally organized farmer networks are emerging as a unique entity that blend the benefits of decentralized exchange of farmer knowledge within the structure of an organization providing a variety of sources of information and forms of engagement. We define formal farmer networks as farmer networks with a distinct membership and organizational structure, leadership that includes farmers, and an emphasis on peer-to-peer learning. This study complements existing ethnographic research on the benefits of organized farmer networking by examining farmers in one longstanding formal farmer network, Practical Farmers of Iowa. Using a nested, mixed-method research design, we analyzed survey and interview data to understand how participation and forms of engagement in the network are associated with the adoption of conservation practices. Responses from 677 farmers from a regular member survey disseminated by Practical Farmers of Iowa in 2013, 2017, and 2020 were pooled and analyzed. GLM binomial and ordered logistic regression results indicate that greater participation in the network, particularly through in-person formats, has a strong and significant association with greater adoption of conservation practices. Logistic regression results show that building relationships in the network is the most important variable for predicting whether a farmer reported adopting conservation practices as a result of participation in PFI. In-depth interviews with 26 surveyed member farmers revealed that PFI supports farmers to adopt by providing information, resources, encouragement, confidence building, and reinforcement. In-person learning formats were more important to farmers relative to independent formats because they were able to have side conversations with other farmers, ask questions, and observe results. We conclude that formal networks are a promising way to expand the use of conservation practices, particularly through targeted efforts to increase relationship building in the network through face-to-face learning opportunities.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"40 4","pages":"1559 - 1580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155147/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-023-10451-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Substantial evidence has shown that involvement in peer-to-peer farming networks influences whether a farmer decides to try a new practice. Formally organized farmer networks are emerging as a unique entity that blend the benefits of decentralized exchange of farmer knowledge within the structure of an organization providing a variety of sources of information and forms of engagement. We define formal farmer networks as farmer networks with a distinct membership and organizational structure, leadership that includes farmers, and an emphasis on peer-to-peer learning. This study complements existing ethnographic research on the benefits of organized farmer networking by examining farmers in one longstanding formal farmer network, Practical Farmers of Iowa. Using a nested, mixed-method research design, we analyzed survey and interview data to understand how participation and forms of engagement in the network are associated with the adoption of conservation practices. Responses from 677 farmers from a regular member survey disseminated by Practical Farmers of Iowa in 2013, 2017, and 2020 were pooled and analyzed. GLM binomial and ordered logistic regression results indicate that greater participation in the network, particularly through in-person formats, has a strong and significant association with greater adoption of conservation practices. Logistic regression results show that building relationships in the network is the most important variable for predicting whether a farmer reported adopting conservation practices as a result of participation in PFI. In-depth interviews with 26 surveyed member farmers revealed that PFI supports farmers to adopt by providing information, resources, encouragement, confidence building, and reinforcement. In-person learning formats were more important to farmers relative to independent formats because they were able to have side conversations with other farmers, ask questions, and observe results. We conclude that formal networks are a promising way to expand the use of conservation practices, particularly through targeted efforts to increase relationship building in the network through face-to-face learning opportunities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在玉米带采用保护措施:一个正式的农民网络,爱荷华州实用农民的作用。
大量证据表明,参与对等农业网络会影响农民是否决定尝试新的做法。正式组织的农民网络正在成为一个独特的实体,它在提供各种信息来源和参与形式的组织结构中融合了分散交流农民知识的好处。我们将正式的农民网络定义为具有独特成员和组织结构、包括农民在内的领导层以及强调对等学习的农民网络。这项研究补充了现有的关于有组织的农民网络的好处的人种学研究,通过在一个长期存在的正式农民网络,爱荷华州的实际农民中调查农民。使用嵌套的混合方法研究设计,我们分析了调查和访谈数据,以了解网络中的参与和参与形式与保护实践的采用之间的关系。汇集并分析了爱荷华州实用农民组织在2013年、2017年和2020年发布的一项定期成员调查中677名农民的回复。GLM二项式和有序逻辑回归结果表明,更多地参与网络,特别是通过面对面的形式,与更多地采用保护实践有着强烈而显著的联系。Logistic回归结果表明,在网络中建立关系是预测农民是否因参与PFI而报告采取保护措施的最重要变量。对26名受访成员农民的深入采访显示,PFI通过提供信息、资源、鼓励、建立信心和加强来支持农民收养。与独立学习模式相比,面对面学习模式对农民来说更重要,因为他们能够与其他农民进行侧面对话、提问并观察结果。我们得出的结论是,正式的网络是扩大保护实践使用的一种很有前途的方式,特别是通过有针对性的努力,通过面对面的学习机会加强网络中的关系建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信