Clinical Effect of Intrauterine 3-Dimensional Ultrasound on the Function of the Intrauterine Cavity of Puerpera With Intrauterine Adhesions and Safety of Pregnancy.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Qin Li
{"title":"Clinical Effect of Intrauterine 3-Dimensional Ultrasound on the Function of the Intrauterine Cavity of Puerpera With Intrauterine Adhesions and Safety of Pregnancy.","authors":"Qin Li","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the diagnostic value of intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound and the functional characteristics of the intrauterine cavity for puerpera with intrauterine adhesions, and to explore the safety of pregnancy after treatment. A total of 102 puerperas with intrauterine adhesions were randomly selected, and intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound and 2-dimensional ultrasound were performed, respectively. Patients were followed up for 3 years to observe the pregnancy outcome and safety. The overall accuracy of diagnosing intrauterine adhesions through intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound was significantly higher than that through 2-dimensional ultrasound, and the accuracy of detecting mild intrauterine adhesions was significantly higher than that through 2-dimensional ultrasound, with statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy between intrauterine 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional ultrasound in detecting moderate and severe intrauterine adhesions ( P > 0.05). The difference in missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis rates between the 2 methods was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). All patients received hysteroscopic surgery, and 78 cases (76.47%) were naturally fertilized during postoperative follow-up, including 24 cases of mature delivery, 45 cases of cesarean delivery, and 9 cases of spontaneous abortion. The intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound examination of the intrauterine cavity will provide intuitive and comprehensive diagnostic information for a parturient with intrauterine adhesion. Its detection accuracy is higher, and the clinical application is noninvasive and safe, which has certain guiding significance for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the diagnostic value of intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound and the functional characteristics of the intrauterine cavity for puerpera with intrauterine adhesions, and to explore the safety of pregnancy after treatment. A total of 102 puerperas with intrauterine adhesions were randomly selected, and intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound and 2-dimensional ultrasound were performed, respectively. Patients were followed up for 3 years to observe the pregnancy outcome and safety. The overall accuracy of diagnosing intrauterine adhesions through intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound was significantly higher than that through 2-dimensional ultrasound, and the accuracy of detecting mild intrauterine adhesions was significantly higher than that through 2-dimensional ultrasound, with statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy between intrauterine 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional ultrasound in detecting moderate and severe intrauterine adhesions ( P > 0.05). The difference in missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis rates between the 2 methods was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). All patients received hysteroscopic surgery, and 78 cases (76.47%) were naturally fertilized during postoperative follow-up, including 24 cases of mature delivery, 45 cases of cesarean delivery, and 9 cases of spontaneous abortion. The intrauterine 3-dimensional ultrasound examination of the intrauterine cavity will provide intuitive and comprehensive diagnostic information for a parturient with intrauterine adhesion. Its detection accuracy is higher, and the clinical application is noninvasive and safe, which has certain guiding significance for treatment.

宫内三维超声对宫内粘连产妇宫腔功能及妊娠安全的临床影响
摘要:本研究旨在分析宫腔三维超声对宫腔粘连产妇的诊断价值及宫腔功能特点,探讨治疗后妊娠的安全性。随机选取宫内粘连产妇102例,分别行宫内三维超声和二维超声检查。随访3年,观察妊娠结局及安全性。宫腔三维超声对宫腔粘连诊断的总体准确率显著高于二维超声,对轻度宫腔粘连诊断的准确率显著高于二维超声,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。宫腔三维超声与二维超声对中重度宫腔粘连的检测准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两种方法的漏诊率、误诊率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。所有患者均行宫腔镜手术,术后随访自然受精78例(76.47%),其中成熟分娩24例,剖宫产45例,自然流产9例。宫腔三维超声检查可为宫腔粘连患儿提供直观、全面的诊断信息。其检测准确率较高,且临床应用无创、安全,对治疗具有一定的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信