Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation for the Management of Patients With Benign Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jian Ding, Duo Wang, Wenbin Zhang, Dexin Xu, Wenhai Wang
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation for the Management of Patients With Benign Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jian Ding,&nbsp;Duo Wang,&nbsp;Wenbin Zhang,&nbsp;Dexin Xu,&nbsp;Wenhai Wang","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation has been shown to considerably reduce nodule-related discomfort and cosmetic problems. Hence, this review was done to determine the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency or microwave ablation in the management of benign thyroid nodules. Searches were done in EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed Central, Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Clinicaltrials.gov until August 2022. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects model. With 95% confidence intervals (CIs), pooled standardized mean differences, mean differences, and/or odds ratio reported. In total, we analyzed 16 studies, most of them had high risk of bias. The pooled standardized mean difference for symptom score was -1.01 (95% CI, -1.83 to -0.19; I2 = 94.2%), for cosmetic relief was -1.26 (95% CI, -2.27 to -0.24; I2 = 96%), for postoperative nodule volume was -1.77 (95% CI, -3.06 to -0.48; I2 = 94%), for hospital stay was -3.88 (95% CI, -4.58 to -3.18; I2 = 91.1%), for operation time was -3.30 (95% CI, -3.95 to -2.64; I2 = 93.4%). The pooled odds ratio for postoperative pain was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.00-0.35; I2 = 95.1%), for postoperative hypothyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.11; I2 = 0%), for postoperative hoarseness was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.22-1.47; I2 = 0%), for postoperative hematoma was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.15-2.22; I2 = 0%). Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency and microwave ablation had better efficacy and safety profile in terms of symptoms, cosmetic relief, complication rate, duration of stay, and operation time when compared with conventional surgery or observation without treatment for patients with benign thyroid nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation has been shown to considerably reduce nodule-related discomfort and cosmetic problems. Hence, this review was done to determine the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency or microwave ablation in the management of benign thyroid nodules. Searches were done in EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed Central, Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Clinicaltrials.gov until August 2022. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects model. With 95% confidence intervals (CIs), pooled standardized mean differences, mean differences, and/or odds ratio reported. In total, we analyzed 16 studies, most of them had high risk of bias. The pooled standardized mean difference for symptom score was -1.01 (95% CI, -1.83 to -0.19; I2 = 94.2%), for cosmetic relief was -1.26 (95% CI, -2.27 to -0.24; I2 = 96%), for postoperative nodule volume was -1.77 (95% CI, -3.06 to -0.48; I2 = 94%), for hospital stay was -3.88 (95% CI, -4.58 to -3.18; I2 = 91.1%), for operation time was -3.30 (95% CI, -3.95 to -2.64; I2 = 93.4%). The pooled odds ratio for postoperative pain was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.00-0.35; I2 = 95.1%), for postoperative hypothyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.11; I2 = 0%), for postoperative hoarseness was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.22-1.47; I2 = 0%), for postoperative hematoma was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.15-2.22; I2 = 0%). Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency and microwave ablation had better efficacy and safety profile in terms of symptoms, cosmetic relief, complication rate, duration of stay, and operation time when compared with conventional surgery or observation without treatment for patients with benign thyroid nodules.

超声引导射频和微波消融治疗良性甲状腺结节:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
超声引导的热消融已被证明可以显著减少结节相关的不适和美容问题。因此,本综述旨在确定超声引导下射频或微波消融治疗良性甲状腺结节的有效性。截至2022年8月,在EMBASE、SCOPUS、PubMed Central、Cochrane library、MEDLINE、Google Scholar、ScienceDirect和Clinicaltrials.gov中进行了检索。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。95%置信区间(ci),合并标准化平均差异,平均差异,和/或优势比报告。我们总共分析了16项研究,其中大多数具有高偏倚风险。症状评分的合并标准化平均差异为-1.01 (95% CI, -1.83 ~ -0.19;I2 = 94.2%),美容缓解为-1.26 (95% CI, -2.27至-0.24;I2 = 96%),术后结节体积为-1.77 (95% CI, -3.06 ~ -0.48;I2 = 94%),住院时间为-3.88 (95% CI, -4.58至-3.18;I2 = 91.1%),手术时间为-3.30 (95% CI, -3.95 ~ -2.64;I2 = 93.4%)。术后疼痛的合并优势比为0.04 (95% CI, 0.00-0.35;I2 = 95.1%),术后甲状腺功能减退为0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.11;I2 = 0%),术后声音嘶哑为0.56 (95% CI, 0.22-1.47;I2 = 0%),术后血肿为0.57 (95% CI, 0.15-2.22;I2 = 0%)。超声引导下射频和微波消融对甲状腺良性结节患者在症状、美观缓解、并发症发生率、住院时间、手术时间等方面均优于常规手术或观察不治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信