Angiographic Features of Iris Melanocytic Tumors: Nevus versus Melanoma.

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ocular Oncology and Pathology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1159/000529073
Janani Singaravelu, Alexander Melendez-Moreno, Jacquelyn Wrenn, Arun D Singh
{"title":"Angiographic Features of Iris Melanocytic Tumors: Nevus versus Melanoma.","authors":"Janani Singaravelu, Alexander Melendez-Moreno, Jacquelyn Wrenn, Arun D Singh","doi":"10.1159/000529073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Determining the nature of iris melanocytic tumors based on clinical exam alone remains challenging. Tumor-associated vasculature of iris melanocytic lesions may facilitate the ability to discern between iris nevus and melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-institution, retrospective, observational study of 45 patients with pathologically confirmed iris melanoma and 15 patients with iris nevi that were either clinically stable or pathologically confirmed were included. Tumor characteristics and associated vasculature were identified on clinical exam and slit-lamp photographs. Fluorescein angiographic parameters including feeder vessels, intrinsic vessels, leakage, masking, and angiographic silence were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feeder vessels were present in 17 (43%) melanomas and were absent in the nevus group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Thirty-three (83%) iris melanomas and 5 (33%) iris nevi were observed to have intrinsic vessels, and a statistically significant association of intrinsic vessels with malignancy (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was noted. Fluorescein leakage was also observed more frequently in iris melanoma 39 (98%) than in nevi 9 (60) with a significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Angiographic silence occurred in 3 nevi (20%) and was not observed in any melanoma (<i>p</i> = 0.017). Overall, the presence of intrinsic vessels +/- feeder vessels had high sensitivity (0.85) and high positive predictive value (0.87) for diagnosis of iris melanoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior segment fluorescein angiography allows for the assessment of tumor-associated vascular patterns and demonstrates utility in differentiating iris nevi from melanoma. Feeder vessels were only observed in iris melanoma and were absent in iris nevi. The intrinsic vessels were present more frequently in melanomas and are thus associated with malignancy. Angiographic silence is indicative of iris nevi.</p>","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Determining the nature of iris melanocytic tumors based on clinical exam alone remains challenging. Tumor-associated vasculature of iris melanocytic lesions may facilitate the ability to discern between iris nevus and melanoma.

Methods: In a single-institution, retrospective, observational study of 45 patients with pathologically confirmed iris melanoma and 15 patients with iris nevi that were either clinically stable or pathologically confirmed were included. Tumor characteristics and associated vasculature were identified on clinical exam and slit-lamp photographs. Fluorescein angiographic parameters including feeder vessels, intrinsic vessels, leakage, masking, and angiographic silence were assessed.

Results: Feeder vessels were present in 17 (43%) melanomas and were absent in the nevus group (p = 0.002). Thirty-three (83%) iris melanomas and 5 (33%) iris nevi were observed to have intrinsic vessels, and a statistically significant association of intrinsic vessels with malignancy (p = 0.001) was noted. Fluorescein leakage was also observed more frequently in iris melanoma 39 (98%) than in nevi 9 (60) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). Angiographic silence occurred in 3 nevi (20%) and was not observed in any melanoma (p = 0.017). Overall, the presence of intrinsic vessels +/- feeder vessels had high sensitivity (0.85) and high positive predictive value (0.87) for diagnosis of iris melanoma.

Conclusions: Anterior segment fluorescein angiography allows for the assessment of tumor-associated vascular patterns and demonstrates utility in differentiating iris nevi from melanoma. Feeder vessels were only observed in iris melanoma and were absent in iris nevi. The intrinsic vessels were present more frequently in melanomas and are thus associated with malignancy. Angiographic silence is indicative of iris nevi.

虹膜黑色素细胞肿瘤的血管造影特征:痣与黑色素瘤
导言:仅凭临床检查来确定虹膜黑色素细胞肿瘤的性质仍然具有挑战性。虹膜黑色素细胞病变的肿瘤相关血管可能有助于鉴别虹膜痣和黑色素瘤:在一项单一机构的回顾性观察研究中,共纳入了 45 例经病理证实的虹膜黑色素瘤患者和 15 例临床稳定或经病理证实的虹膜痣患者。根据临床检查和裂隙灯照片确定了肿瘤特征和相关血管。评估荧光素血管造影参数,包括馈源血管、内在血管、渗漏、遮盖和血管造影沉默:结果:17 例(43%)黑色素瘤存在馈血管,而痣组则没有(P = 0.002)。观察发现,33 例(83%)虹膜黑色素瘤和 5 例(33%)虹膜痣有内在血管,内在血管与恶性程度有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。此外,虹膜黑色素瘤 39 例(98%)比痣 9 例(60%)更容易出现荧光素渗漏,两者差异显著(p = 0.001)。血管沉默发生在 3 个痣中(20%),没有在任何黑色素瘤中观察到(p = 0.017)。总体而言,内在血管 +/- 支血管的存在对虹膜黑色素瘤的诊断具有较高的灵敏度(0.85)和阳性预测值(0.87):结论:前节段荧光素血管造影可评估与肿瘤相关的血管形态,在区分虹膜痣和黑色素瘤方面具有实用价值。只有在虹膜黑色素瘤中才能观察到馈源血管,而虹膜痣中则没有。黑色素瘤中更常出现内在血管,因此与恶性肿瘤有关。血管造影显示虹膜痣没有血管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信