Disrupted Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Among Cognitive Control Networks in the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain connectivity Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-07 DOI:10.1089/brain.2020.0847
Mohammad S E Sendi, Elaheh Zendehrouh, Zening Fu, Jingyu Liu, Yuhui Du, Elizabeth Mormino, David H Salat, Vince D Calhoun, Robyn L Miller
{"title":"Disrupted Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity Among Cognitive Control Networks in the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Mohammad S E Sendi, Elaheh Zendehrouh, Zening Fu, Jingyu Liu, Yuhui Du, Elizabeth Mormino, David H Salat, Vince D Calhoun, Robyn L Miller","doi":"10.1089/brain.2020.0847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common age-related dementia that promotes a decline in memory, thinking, and social skills. The initial stages of dementia can be associated with mild symptoms, and symptom progression to a more severe state is heterogeneous across patients. Recent work has demonstrated the potential for functional network mapping to assist in the prediction of symptomatic progression. However, this work has primarily used static functional connectivity (sFC) from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) has been recognized as a powerful advance in functional connectivity methodology to differentiate brain network dynamics between healthy and diseased populations. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Group independent component analysis was applied to extract 17 components within the cognitive control network (CCN) from 1385 individuals across varying stages of AD symptomology. We estimated dFC among 17 components within the CCN, followed by clustering the dFCs into 3 recurring brain states, and then estimated a hidden Markov model and the occupancy rate for each subject. Then, we investigated the link between CCN dFC features and AD progression. Also, we investigated the link between sFC and AD progression and compared its results with dFC results. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Progression of AD symptoms was associated with increases in connectivity within the middle frontal gyrus. Also, the very mild AD (vmAD) showed less connectivity within the inferior parietal lobule (in both sFC and dFC) and between this region and the rest of CCN (in dFC analysis). Also, we found that within-middle frontal gyrus connectivity increases with AD progression in both sFC and dFC results. Finally, comparing with vmAD, we found that the normal brain spends significantly more time in a state with lower within-middle frontal gyrus connectivity and higher connectivity between the hippocampus and the rest of CCN, highlighting the importance of assessing the dynamics of brain connectivity in this disease. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our results suggest that AD progress not only alters the CCN connectivity strength but also changes the temporal properties in this brain network. This suggests the temporal and spatial pattern of CCN as a biomarker that differentiates different stages of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9155,"journal":{"name":"Brain connectivity","volume":"13 6","pages":"334-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2020.0847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common age-related dementia that promotes a decline in memory, thinking, and social skills. The initial stages of dementia can be associated with mild symptoms, and symptom progression to a more severe state is heterogeneous across patients. Recent work has demonstrated the potential for functional network mapping to assist in the prediction of symptomatic progression. However, this work has primarily used static functional connectivity (sFC) from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) has been recognized as a powerful advance in functional connectivity methodology to differentiate brain network dynamics between healthy and diseased populations. Methods: Group independent component analysis was applied to extract 17 components within the cognitive control network (CCN) from 1385 individuals across varying stages of AD symptomology. We estimated dFC among 17 components within the CCN, followed by clustering the dFCs into 3 recurring brain states, and then estimated a hidden Markov model and the occupancy rate for each subject. Then, we investigated the link between CCN dFC features and AD progression. Also, we investigated the link between sFC and AD progression and compared its results with dFC results. Results: Progression of AD symptoms was associated with increases in connectivity within the middle frontal gyrus. Also, the very mild AD (vmAD) showed less connectivity within the inferior parietal lobule (in both sFC and dFC) and between this region and the rest of CCN (in dFC analysis). Also, we found that within-middle frontal gyrus connectivity increases with AD progression in both sFC and dFC results. Finally, comparing with vmAD, we found that the normal brain spends significantly more time in a state with lower within-middle frontal gyrus connectivity and higher connectivity between the hippocampus and the rest of CCN, highlighting the importance of assessing the dynamics of brain connectivity in this disease. Conclusion: Our results suggest that AD progress not only alters the CCN connectivity strength but also changes the temporal properties in this brain network. This suggests the temporal and spatial pattern of CCN as a biomarker that differentiates different stages of AD.

认知控制网络在阿尔茨海默病进展中的动态功能网络连接中断。
背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的与年龄相关的痴呆症,它会导致记忆、思维和社交技能的下降。痴呆的初始阶段可能与轻度症状相关,而症状进展到更严重的状态在患者之间是不一样的。最近的工作已经证明了功能网络映射的潜力,以协助预测症状进展。然而,这项工作主要使用静息状态功能磁共振成像的静态功能连接(sFC)。近年来,动态功能连接(dFC)被认为是区分健康人群和患病人群大脑网络动态的功能连接方法的有力进展。方法:采用组独立成分分析,从1385例AD不同症状阶段的个体中提取认知控制网络(CCN)中的17个成分。我们估计了CCN内17个组成部分的dFC,然后将dFC聚类到3个反复出现的大脑状态,然后估计了一个隐马尔可夫模型和每个受试者的占用率。然后,我们研究了CCN dFC特征与AD进展之间的联系。此外,我们还研究了sFC与AD进展之间的联系,并将其结果与dFC结果进行了比较。结果:阿尔茨海默病症状的进展与中额回内连通性的增加有关。此外,非常轻微的AD (vmAD)在顶叶下小叶(在sFC和dFC中)以及该区域与CCN其他部分之间(在dFC分析中)的连通性较少。此外,我们发现在sFC和dFC结果中,中额回内连通性随着AD的进展而增加。最后,与vmAD相比,我们发现正常大脑在额叶中回连接性较低和海马与CCN其他部分之间连接性较高的状态下花费的时间明显更多,这突出了评估该疾病中大脑连接性动态的重要性。结论:阿尔茨海默病的进展不仅改变了CCN的连接强度,而且改变了该大脑网络的时间特性。这表明CCN的时间和空间格局是区分AD不同阶段的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain connectivity
Brain connectivity Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Brain Connectivity provides groundbreaking findings in the rapidly advancing field of connectivity research at the systems and network levels. The Journal disseminates information on brain mapping, modeling, novel research techniques, new imaging modalities, preclinical animal studies, and the translation of research discoveries from the laboratory to the clinic. This essential journal fosters the application of basic biological discoveries and contributes to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to recognize and treat a broad range of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as: Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信