Effect of toothpaste tablets on gloss and surface roughness of resin-based composite materials.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-06-01
Kristina Padilla, Kaitlyn Savage, Hyung Ji Kim, Emily Poon, Daniel Diaz, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Udochukwu Oyoyo, So Ran Kwon
{"title":"Effect of toothpaste tablets on gloss and surface roughness of resin-based composite materials.","authors":"Kristina Padilla,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Savage,&nbsp;Hyung Ji Kim,&nbsp;Emily Poon,&nbsp;Daniel Diaz,&nbsp;Franklin Garcia-Godoy,&nbsp;Udochukwu Oyoyo,&nbsp;So Ran Kwon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of toothpaste tablets on the gloss and surface roughness of resin-based composite materials and determine the relationship between gloss and roughness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rectangular jigs were designed and printed. Wells (2 mm deep x 7 mm diameter) were filled with Filtek Supreme Ultra A2B, light-cured and polished. A small-area glossmeter was used for gloss (GU) measurements and a profilometer for roughness measurements (Ra) at baseline and after challenge with each toothpaste. An automated tooth-brushing machine was set at 120 strokes/minute for a total of 10,000 strokes to evaluate four test groups with 16 specimens in each group. NC: Brushing with distilled water; TABS: Colgate Anywhere Travel Tooth Tabs; CP: Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste and AW: Colgate Whitening Advanced Toothpaste. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the difference in gloss and surface roughness among the groups and Pearson correlation was used to compare the relationship between gloss and roughness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in gloss and roughness among the four groups at baseline. At post-brushing, there was a statistically significant difference among the groups (P< 0.001) with increased roughness and decreased gloss for CP and AW when compared to TABS. There was a statistically significant correlation between post-brushing roughness and post-brushing gloss (P< 0.001, rho: -0.815). Thus, the higher the surface roughness the lower the gloss.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Toothpaste tablets retain better gloss and roughness of resin-based composite materials when compared to conventional toothpastes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 3","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of toothpaste tablets on the gloss and surface roughness of resin-based composite materials and determine the relationship between gloss and roughness.

Methods: Rectangular jigs were designed and printed. Wells (2 mm deep x 7 mm diameter) were filled with Filtek Supreme Ultra A2B, light-cured and polished. A small-area glossmeter was used for gloss (GU) measurements and a profilometer for roughness measurements (Ra) at baseline and after challenge with each toothpaste. An automated tooth-brushing machine was set at 120 strokes/minute for a total of 10,000 strokes to evaluate four test groups with 16 specimens in each group. NC: Brushing with distilled water; TABS: Colgate Anywhere Travel Tooth Tabs; CP: Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste and AW: Colgate Whitening Advanced Toothpaste. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the difference in gloss and surface roughness among the groups and Pearson correlation was used to compare the relationship between gloss and roughness.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in gloss and roughness among the four groups at baseline. At post-brushing, there was a statistically significant difference among the groups (P< 0.001) with increased roughness and decreased gloss for CP and AW when compared to TABS. There was a statistically significant correlation between post-brushing roughness and post-brushing gloss (P< 0.001, rho: -0.815). Thus, the higher the surface roughness the lower the gloss.

Clinical significance: Toothpaste tablets retain better gloss and roughness of resin-based composite materials when compared to conventional toothpastes.

牙膏片对树脂基复合材料光泽度和表面粗糙度的影响。
目的:评价牙膏片对树脂基复合材料光泽度和表面粗糙度的影响,确定光泽度与表面粗糙度的关系。方法:设计并印制矩形夹具。井(2mm深x 7mm直径)填充Filtek Supreme Ultra A2B,光固化和抛光。使用小面积光泽度计测量光泽度(GU),并使用轮廓仪测量粗糙度(Ra)。自动刷牙机设置为120笔/分钟,共10000笔,评估4个试验组,每组16个标本。NC:用蒸馏水刷牙;标签:高露洁旅行牙齿标签;CP:高露洁防蛀牙膏和AW:高露洁美白高级牙膏。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验各组间光泽度和表面粗糙度的差异,采用Pearson相关比较光泽度和表面粗糙度的关系。结果:四组牙的光泽度和粗糙度在基线时无统计学差异。在刷牙后,与tab相比,CP和AW的粗糙度增加,光泽降低,组间差异有统计学意义(P< 0.001)。刷后粗糙度与刷后光泽度有统计学意义(P< 0.001, rho: -0.815)。因此,表面粗糙度越高,光泽越低。临床意义:与传统牙膏相比,牙膏片保留了树脂基复合材料更好的光泽和粗糙度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信