A comparison of toothpaste tablets and a sodium fluoride dentifrice for the control of supragingival plaque and gingivitis: A 2-week randomized controlled trial.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-08-01
Amber Martinez, Jaclyn Im, Emili Bezman, Esther Lee, Dominic DeAnda, Rachel Ree, Udochukwu Oyoyo, So Ran Kwon
{"title":"A comparison of toothpaste tablets and a sodium fluoride dentifrice for the control of supragingival plaque and gingivitis: A 2-week randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Amber Martinez,&nbsp;Jaclyn Im,&nbsp;Emili Bezman,&nbsp;Esther Lee,&nbsp;Dominic DeAnda,&nbsp;Rachel Ree,&nbsp;Udochukwu Oyoyo,&nbsp;So Ran Kwon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare toothpaste tablets containing 0.243% sodium fluoride and a conventional sodium fluoride dentifrice for gingivitis and plaque control over a 2-week period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty adult participants were randomized into two groups: Toothpaste tablets (Colgate Anywhere Travel Toothpaste Tablets) and conventional dentifrice (Colgate Cavity Protection). A blinded examiner measured the gingival and plaque index at baseline and after 2 weeks. A questionnaire was distributed at the end to determine overall satisfaction of the product used. Statistical analyses were performed separately for the gingival index and plaque index scores. Comparisons of the two treatment groups with respect to baseline and 2-week gingival index and plaque index scores were performed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Within-treatment comparisons of the gingival index and plaque index scores obtained at the 2-week examinations versus baseline were performed using Wilcoxon test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had statistically significant improvements in plaque control at the 2-week visit (P< 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for gingival and plaque index at the 2-week visit (P> 0.05). Overall satisfaction for both products were positive while perception on \"texture/foaminess\" was more negative for toothpaste tablets (P= 0.001). The results showed that toothpaste tablets' short-term performance on gingivitis and plaque control was equivalent to conventional dentifrice while the \" texture/foaminess\" of toothpaste tablets was found to be less appealing.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Toothpaste tablets are a relatively new form of toothpaste that can be a viable alternative to conventional dentifrice with the added benefit of an eco-friendly way of maintaining oral hygiene.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 4","pages":"172-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare toothpaste tablets containing 0.243% sodium fluoride and a conventional sodium fluoride dentifrice for gingivitis and plaque control over a 2-week period.

Methods: Forty adult participants were randomized into two groups: Toothpaste tablets (Colgate Anywhere Travel Toothpaste Tablets) and conventional dentifrice (Colgate Cavity Protection). A blinded examiner measured the gingival and plaque index at baseline and after 2 weeks. A questionnaire was distributed at the end to determine overall satisfaction of the product used. Statistical analyses were performed separately for the gingival index and plaque index scores. Comparisons of the two treatment groups with respect to baseline and 2-week gingival index and plaque index scores were performed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Within-treatment comparisons of the gingival index and plaque index scores obtained at the 2-week examinations versus baseline were performed using Wilcoxon test.

Results: Both groups had statistically significant improvements in plaque control at the 2-week visit (P< 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for gingival and plaque index at the 2-week visit (P> 0.05). Overall satisfaction for both products were positive while perception on "texture/foaminess" was more negative for toothpaste tablets (P= 0.001). The results showed that toothpaste tablets' short-term performance on gingivitis and plaque control was equivalent to conventional dentifrice while the " texture/foaminess" of toothpaste tablets was found to be less appealing.

Clinical significance: Toothpaste tablets are a relatively new form of toothpaste that can be a viable alternative to conventional dentifrice with the added benefit of an eco-friendly way of maintaining oral hygiene.

牙膏片和氟化钠牙膏控制龈上菌斑和牙龈炎的比较:一项为期2周的随机对照试验。
目的:比较含0.243%氟化钠牙膏片和常规氟化钠牙膏在牙龈炎和牙菌斑控制两周内的疗效。方法:40名成年受试者随机分为两组:牙膏片(高露洁Anywhere旅行牙膏片)和普通牙膏(高露洁龋齿保护剂)。盲法检查者在基线和2周后测量牙龈和菌斑指数。最后分发了一份调查问卷,以确定所使用产品的总体满意度。分别对牙龈指数和菌斑指数评分进行统计分析。使用Mann-Whitney u检验比较两个治疗组的基线和2周牙龈指数和菌斑指数得分。使用Wilcoxon检验对治疗期间2周检查时获得的牙龈指数和菌斑指数评分与基线进行比较。结果:两组患者术后2周斑块控制均有显著改善(P< 0.05)。两组患者2周牙龈指数、菌斑指数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。对两种产品的总体满意度都是积极的,而对牙膏片的“质地/泡沫”的看法更为消极(P= 0.001)。结果表明,牙膏片对牙龈炎和菌斑的短期控制效果与传统牙膏相当,而牙膏片的“质地/泡沫”则不如传统牙膏吸引人。临床意义:牙膏片是一种相对较新的牙膏形式,可以作为传统牙膏的可行替代品,同时还具有保持口腔卫生的环保方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信