Peak atrial longitudinal strain represents atrial fibrillation burden in daily practice: clinical implication of routine left atrial strain measurements.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tsutomu Takagi, Takeshi Hosomi
{"title":"Peak atrial longitudinal strain represents atrial fibrillation burden in daily practice: clinical implication of routine left atrial strain measurements.","authors":"Tsutomu Takagi,&nbsp;Takeshi Hosomi","doi":"10.1007/s12574-022-00595-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Usefulness of left atrial (LA) strain measurements using speckle tracking echocardiography has been reported in various clinical settings. However, clinical implication of routine LA strain measurements in daily practice remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical utility of routine LA strain measurements in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 6, 2020 to December 28, 2021, 338 consecutive patients underwent echocardiography in Takagi Cardiology Clinic, and all comers were enrolled to the study. Echocardiographic measurements including peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) measurement using speckle tracking echocardiography were attempted in all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PALS was obtained in 335 patients (age 71 ± 16 years, male 43%, hypertensive 74%), and mean value was 22.3 ± 11.5%. PALS was progressively impaired with worsening atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. PALS in patients without AF, in patients with history of AF (paroxysmal AF &/or ablation therapy), and in patients with AF onsite were 26.8 ± 9.8%, 20.3 ± 7.9%, and 8.1 ± 3.3%, respectively (anova p < 0.0001). In patients without history of AF at the time of echocardiography, using cut-off value of 15.0% (i.e., mean + 2SD of PALS in AF patients), Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that impaired PALS was associated with increased new-onset AF during follow-up period (log-rank p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In daily practice, PALS represents AF burden. Furthermore, impaired PALS is associated with increased new-onset AF. Therefore, routine LA strain measurements using speckle tracking echocardiography will be useful in risk stratification of AF in daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":"21 3","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-022-00595-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Usefulness of left atrial (LA) strain measurements using speckle tracking echocardiography has been reported in various clinical settings. However, clinical implication of routine LA strain measurements in daily practice remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical utility of routine LA strain measurements in daily practice.

Methods: From January 6, 2020 to December 28, 2021, 338 consecutive patients underwent echocardiography in Takagi Cardiology Clinic, and all comers were enrolled to the study. Echocardiographic measurements including peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) measurement using speckle tracking echocardiography were attempted in all patients.

Results: PALS was obtained in 335 patients (age 71 ± 16 years, male 43%, hypertensive 74%), and mean value was 22.3 ± 11.5%. PALS was progressively impaired with worsening atrial fibrillation (AF) burden. PALS in patients without AF, in patients with history of AF (paroxysmal AF &/or ablation therapy), and in patients with AF onsite were 26.8 ± 9.8%, 20.3 ± 7.9%, and 8.1 ± 3.3%, respectively (anova p < 0.0001). In patients without history of AF at the time of echocardiography, using cut-off value of 15.0% (i.e., mean + 2SD of PALS in AF patients), Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that impaired PALS was associated with increased new-onset AF during follow-up period (log-rank p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: In daily practice, PALS represents AF burden. Furthermore, impaired PALS is associated with increased new-onset AF. Therefore, routine LA strain measurements using speckle tracking echocardiography will be useful in risk stratification of AF in daily practice.

峰值心房纵向应变代表心房颤动负担在日常实践:常规左心房应变测量的临床意义。
背景:利用斑点跟踪超声心动图测量左心房(LA)应变的有效性已在各种临床环境中得到报道。然而,在日常实践中常规LA应变测量的临床意义尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估常规LA应变测量在日常实践中的临床应用。方法:2020年1月6日至2021年12月28日,在高木心脏病诊所连续338例患者接受超声心动图检查,所有患者均纳入研究。超声心动图测量包括使用散斑跟踪超声心动图测量心房纵应变峰值(PALS)。结果:335例患者获得PALS,其中年龄71±16岁,男性43%,高血压患者74%,平均22.3±11.5%。随着房颤(AF)负担的加重,PALS逐渐受损。无房颤患者、有房颤病史(阵发性房颤和/或消融治疗)患者和房颤现场患者的PALS分别为26.8±9.8%、20.3±7.9%和8.1±3.3%(方差分析)结论:在日常实践中,PALS代表房颤负担。此外,pal受损与新发房颤的增加有关。因此,在日常实践中,使用斑点跟踪超声心动图进行常规LA应变测量将有助于房颤的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Echocardiography
Journal of Echocardiography CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Echocardiography, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, publishes work that contributes to progress in the field and articles in clinical research as well, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with this discipline. The journal welcomes original investigations, review articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and case image in cardiovascular ultrasound, which will be reviewed by the editorial board. The Journal of Echocardiography provides the best of up-to-date information from around the world, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信