Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Surpassing the Elastic Layer Should Remain Classified as pT2a

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jing-Sheng Cai PhD , Xiao-Meng Dou MD
{"title":"Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Surpassing the Elastic Layer Should Remain Classified as pT2a","authors":"Jing-Sheng Cai PhD ,&nbsp;Xiao-Meng Dou MD","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of visceral pleural invasion on the survival of node-negative non-small cell lung cancer ≤3 cm using a large cohort. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS); competing risk analysis<span> with Fine–Gray's test was used to compare cancer- specific survival between groups. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized Cox regression<span> model was used to identify prognostic factors. In total, 9725 eligible cases were included in this study, and they were separated into 3 groups: tumor invasion beneath the elastic layer (PL0), 8837 cases; tumor invasion surpassing the elastic layer (PL1), 505 cases; and tumor invasion to the visceral pleural surface (PL2), 383 cases. Visceral pleural invasion was more likely to occur in poorly differentiated and larger-sized tumors. Survival curves displayed that PL0 conferred better survival rates than PL1 and PL2, and PL1 achieved outcomes equivalent to those of PL2. Tumor size and histology subset analyses further corroborated this conclusion. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator -penalized Cox regression analysis confirmed that PL status was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and cancer- specific survival. This study supported the notion that in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer ≤3 cm, PL1 patients should remain classified as pT2a, which could improve staging accuracy.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922001186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of visceral pleural invasion on the survival of node-negative non-small cell lung cancer ≤3 cm using a large cohort. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS); competing risk analysis with Fine–Gray's test was used to compare cancer- specific survival between groups. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors. In total, 9725 eligible cases were included in this study, and they were separated into 3 groups: tumor invasion beneath the elastic layer (PL0), 8837 cases; tumor invasion surpassing the elastic layer (PL1), 505 cases; and tumor invasion to the visceral pleural surface (PL2), 383 cases. Visceral pleural invasion was more likely to occur in poorly differentiated and larger-sized tumors. Survival curves displayed that PL0 conferred better survival rates than PL1 and PL2, and PL1 achieved outcomes equivalent to those of PL2. Tumor size and histology subset analyses further corroborated this conclusion. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator -penalized Cox regression analysis confirmed that PL status was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and cancer- specific survival. This study supported the notion that in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer ≤3 cm, PL1 patients should remain classified as pT2a, which could improve staging accuracy.

超过弹性层的非小细胞肺癌癌症应保留为pT2a
我们的目的是评估内脏胸膜侵犯对≤3cm结阴性非小细胞肺癌癌症生存率的预后价值。Kaplan–Meier方法用于比较总生存率(OS);使用Fine–Gray检验的竞争风险分析来比较各组之间癌症特异性生存率。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子惩罚Cox回归模型来确定预后因素。本研究共纳入9725例符合条件的病例,并将其分为3组:弹性层下肿瘤浸润(PL0)8837例;肿瘤侵犯超过弹性层(PL1)505例;肿瘤侵犯内脏胸膜表面383例。内脏胸膜侵犯更可能发生在分化差和较大的肿瘤中。生存曲线显示,PL0的生存率高于PL1和PL2,PL1的结果与PL2相当。肿瘤大小和组织学亚群分析进一步证实了这一结论。最小绝对收缩和选择算子惩罚Cox回归分析证实PL状态是OS和癌症特异性生存的独立预后因素。这项研究支持了这样一种观点,即在≤3cm的结阴性非小细胞肺癌中,PL1患者应保留为pT2a,这可以提高分期准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信